Jackisme: guys lets just wait till the game comes out, if CDPR should brake there promise people will call them out on there BS and everyone of us hase the freedom to not buy or support them
Yunipuma: No.
If we stand our ground there is still a chance that they will change some of the bad decisions (Windows 7 support, return of man/woman option, maybe even some TP view for us to enjoy our character in his/her her clothes).
If we remain silent they will release the game as it is now & then no changes will be possible (because it will be too costly for them financially).
You seriously want them to commit to supporting the game in a stone dead and unsupported OS environment? As I've told you before, this one is less on CDPR and rather more on MS. But even you don't want to break yourself on the rock that getting MS to carry on supporting Win 7, do you?
As for return of m/w option, not likely. But it will probably be something you can mod since I imagine that it really was just textboxes on the menu and voice asset selection criteria that was removed. I cannot imagine that they would mess around with anything deeper than that this close to release, with this much character-dependent content created.
The risk of screwing something up (well above zero) far exceeds the potential reward (a tiny bit of positive goodwill in a segment that will hate the game anyway, more publicity that the game already has quite a lot of) of that sort of change. The change makes sense if it's a sub-hour risk-free effort, not if it actually involves tampering with the core workings of the game.
Finally, you want 3PV in a game that CDPR has spent years telling players would be first person. They could add more cutscenes and in principle they should be quite able to make such addition optional, meaning an options toggle for "additional cutscenes", but cutscenes have to be crafted with some care. This one I think is less unrealistic, if enough people ask nicely.
Still, time spent adding additional cutscenes and 3PV scenes is time they are spending on something that is not additional content that can be sold for profit. I reckon there'd have to be some serious interest for this in a segment they consider important for them to go through the effort.
Anyway, you do you. I'm not saying you should give up hope, but some of the things you're wishing for are bordering on world peace in terms of how unrealistic they would seem to be.
Ramalian: One question, what is wrong with ONLY cosmetic microtransations? There is no problem with it, the problem is when company is too greedy and implement P2W elements there.
Depends a bit on how it's done. Path of Exiles is a bit shady in terms of pricing and even cosmetic only mtx can very easily end up building addiction, but the one thing that sort of justifies PoE is that the game is F2P.
But a game that you're already paying full triple-A price for? That's just rubbish. That said, I didn't really mind what BL2 was doing with those extremely bad skinpacks that you could buy for a few bucks. They were ugly as heck and a drop in the ocean relative to all the regularly available skins.