DustyStyx: DOSBox will be slow in places, and some levels will be down right unplayable depending on your hardware. The good part is DOSBox will get better as more development goes into it.
If you really want to get a better performance boost, you could take the effort to compile DOSBox form source code on your specific hardware, I was able to get an average of 10FPS better out of a locally built DOSBox executable, but that was under Linux. Compiling DOSBox on XP is a little more involved than just typing "make DOSBox"
You might also try one of the experimental CVS builds (
http://vogons.zetafleet.com/viewtopic.php?t=9306), but I doubt that there will be much optimization so soon after the release of .74
Now, if you are still looking for what specific conf file you are running, you'll just have to include a few lines in your config file in the autorun section at the bottom, and be diligent to edit them whenever you update/copy them:
echo running x.conf
pause
I've tried the BuildXP guide before, but I seem to remember that there were some problems with it after Microsoft released SP3 for XP, but it has been a while since I've tried it so I can't really verify any problems, or success.
You could also try Krypto's "Improved Blood on XP" instructions found here:
http://forums.transfusion-game.com/viewtopic.php?t=1074 DOSBox is good for networking.
If you are just playing in the episodes or SP maps, Build on XP should work well for you.
Yeah, I think I'm just going to wait until the next version of DosBOX comes out to try again. The idea I've gotten from asking about this subject on random forums is that mostly the newest and fastest computers are able to run Blood in DosBOX with a decent rate. Lots of people on Vogonz have told me Blood puts a high demand on DosBOX, which I can see why with all the detail in Blood compared to games like Doom, Quake, Wolf 3d that I play in DosBOX. I did try the Build XP but I couldn't even get Blood to start that way, most likely because of SP3.