Posted October 12, 2016
Hickory
Almost human
Hickory Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2010
From United Kingdom
crumb24
New User
crumb24 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2009
From United States
Posted October 12, 2016
Don't forget, Beamdog also kills puppies. Someone please save the puppies!!!
Pajama
The Historian
Pajama Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2013
From United Kingdom
Posted October 12, 2016
OK, I think I am missing the point - can you fill me in as I genuinely don't know what Beamdog have to do with why GOG chose not to allow non Galaxy users access to the file?
I know about Beamdog's shabby treatment regarding the Classic versions but I can't see what that has to do with GOG not providing a manual link when 1.3 is already on the server and can be downloaded via Galaxy. As I see it there seems to be no problem about allowing access to version 1.3 at all. The problem seems to be that GOG refuse to put up a manual link to the file.
The restrictions I'm talking about is as I've already stated - that GOG will not put up a link for a manual download of v1.3 but you can download it via Galaxy.
This thread is nothing to do with only being able to access the Classic versions when you buy the EE versions....
I know about Beamdog's shabby treatment regarding the Classic versions but I can't see what that has to do with GOG not providing a manual link when 1.3 is already on the server and can be downloaded via Galaxy. As I see it there seems to be no problem about allowing access to version 1.3 at all. The problem seems to be that GOG refuse to put up a manual link to the file.
Pajama: No, this is on GOG as they have already stated that 1.3 is available for download BUT only via their client. I assume that if Beamdog had put any restrictions in place regarding the download then it wouldn't be downloadable from GOG at all.
Stig79: Restrictions? You mean like people aren't allowed to buy the Classic BG version unless they buy the EE versions? This thread is nothing to do with only being able to access the Classic versions when you buy the EE versions....
Post edited October 12, 2016 by Pajama
Hickory
Almost human
Hickory Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2010
From United Kingdom
Posted October 12, 2016
Pajama: OK, I think I am missing the point - can you fill me in as I genuinely don't know what Beamdog have to do with why GOG chose not to allow non Galaxy users access to the file?
I know about Beamdog's shabby treatment regarding the Classic versions but I can't see what that has to do with GOG not providing a manual link when 1.3 is already on the server and can be downloaded via Galaxy. As I see it there seems to be no problem about allowing access to version 1.3 at all. The problem seems to be that GOG refuse to put up a manual link to the file.
Beamdog created this situation by destroying an otherwise adequate product. I am not saying that Beamdog is influencing GOG's decision to allow or not allow rollbacks, I am saying that Beamdog is directly responsible for GOG having to make a choice such as this; GOG is in a no-win situation because of Beamdog. Remember that GOG can only allow access to files that they are given permission to give access to.I know about Beamdog's shabby treatment regarding the Classic versions but I can't see what that has to do with GOG not providing a manual link when 1.3 is already on the server and can be downloaded via Galaxy. As I see it there seems to be no problem about allowing access to version 1.3 at all. The problem seems to be that GOG refuse to put up a manual link to the file.
Pajama
The Historian
Pajama Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2013
From United Kingdom
Posted October 13, 2016
Hickory: Beamdog created this situation by destroying an otherwise adequate product. I am not saying that Beamdog is influencing GOG's decision to allow or not allow rollbacks, I am saying that Beamdog is directly responsible for GOG having to make a choice such as this; GOG is in a no-win situation because of Beamdog. Remember that GOG can only allow access to files that they are given permission to give access to.
If it is Beamdog that are dictating what files are available for download (and I'm talking specifically about the 1.3 version and NOT the whole debacle about Classic versions) then GOG should say that they are not allowed to put up a manual link to download the file already available via Galaxy. As it stands, it just looks like GOG can't be bothered to make the file downloadable in any other way than by their 'optional' client which smacks of two tier customer service. It's either the Galaxy way or no way :(arxon
<Jet
arxon Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2012
From Czech Republic
Stig79
New User
Stig79 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2014
From Norway
Posted November 30, 2016
low rated
It is because they are showing some EA level of incompetence. They keep alienating fans with these stupid changes, and if someone complains they get labeled a sexist\bigot because the new expansion has a trans character.