Posted on: April 30, 2024

nukeheal

Games: 174 Reviews: 6

This game has potential in the future!

Good - Combat makes this game stands out it has potential for sequal/remake if dev moves to UE5 with better visuals and animations, I can imagine if characters are well build and detailed slow motion effect could be spectacular up close mixed with good animations for photo mode etc. Classes and abilities are fun. Meh - Animations, world design maps, visuals in general are below average even, perhaps becasue its Unity engine. I normally dig story and characters in games and don't mind average writing and dialogues but here I couldn't care less. It was a bit poor lets be fair. Dev used decent voice actors but script wasn't good also quests. Also loot isn't random? Feels like I always pick same items if I reload the game. Its decent but wish it was random what you pick. Gave it 4 stars becasue I am enjoy the combat and I really hope we get a sequal in better engine with good visuals, animations and decent story and quests also deep character creator.

Is this helpful to you?

Posted on: June 20, 2025

greenchor

Verified owner

Games: 252 Reviews: 1

Okayish bite-sized cRPG

Everything about this game is kinda janky. Theres fun to be had if you enjoy tactical rpgs but dont expect too much. Their previous game Tower of TIme was more fun despite lower production values. Theres not many indie level cRPGs so I don't want to be too nitpicky. Give this one a play after you've played all the well-known games in the genre. 3.5/5

Is this helpful to you?

Posted on: July 29, 2024

kfdydak

Verified owner

Games: 638 Reviews: 6

Meh at best

This game is kinda meh. The interface is janky and kinda buggy. The gameplay is weird and not that fun. Some of it is horribly unbalanced where you are thrown like 20 enemies at you with no respite (had to lower difficulty to minimum to pass this one). Then the final boss was a total cakewalk (on normal difficulty). Did the developers EVER actually play their own game ?. I doubt it. Some optional missions are completely bugged. Went to side temple if I remember it was supposed to be huge. Except there was no way to actually get into rest of temple so I just got the initial room with nothing in it. Complete lack of quality control in this game. It is also difficult to figure out what gear is or is not an upgrade as most it has hard to figure out stats that are not explained in-game. The crappy unintuitive interface does not help either. And we are not talking endgame stuff. We are talking about basic gear you get in first few missions. Just steal diablos approach of showing you exactly how much basic attack/defense the item would change (at beginning I just need to know if item is bad or good for me. I am not doing planning for brain surgery). But I guess this developer is not into common sense stuff (the item comparison window is also pretty useless). So to summarize I would recommend again getting this game any price. It is more headache and frustration rather than the entertainment it is supposed to be (and I would be very wary about buying from "Event Horizon" developer in the future)

Is this helpful to you?

Posted on: April 15, 2025

troelsmn

Verified owner

Games: 142 Reviews: 1

Great but unstable

The gameplay is very satisfying. The story, graphics and audio is also fine. However, the game freezes all the time, so I find it hard to recommend. If you liked Tower of Time you will probably like this one too.

Is this helpful to you?

Posted on: June 21, 2025

roz17

Games: 463 Reviews: 3

not bad for a game i never heard of

pretty good for a game i hadn't heard about.. mechanics are good.. could use some refining, the map is tedious, but useful... gameplay is very nice and thought out... mechanics and physics (ability appllciation and such, no flying gore or anything)

Is this helpful to you?

Discover CD PROJEKT RED games

Highlights

Featured

Close, but not an exact hit

Dark Envoy

Other ratings

Add a review

Edit a review

Delete this review?

Report this review

Additional Details (required):

Report this review