BrianX: Yes, I am a repressed America because I like good taste. Sounds like you ate a delicious terd for you to get all bent out of shape over my comment, I guess I ruined your fun by pointing out in a very detailed way that W1's use of sex scenes and profanity was needlessly tacked on and jarring. I AM SO REPRESSED!
Taste is subjective. What is good taste to you is not necessarily good taste to anyone else. If it hasn't already been made clear to you by some of the responses you have received here, your taste is not what most of us would consider "good"; maybe "old-fashioned" or "restrictive", perhaps even "puritanical", but definitely not "good".
Frankly, you are repressed if you are offended by the content in the Witcher (sex scenes? please, I've seen worse stuff in music videos on MTV 20 years ago). Let me explain something to you that you seem to be unaware of: people swear in real life... all the time, people have sex in real life... all the time, people get naked in real life... all the time. Being offended by content that is simply a natural part of being human is the definition of repressed. You don't like what the Witcher has to offer, then why did you even buy it, knowing full well what its rating meant for the content in the game?
BTW - Nice job side-stepping my whole point and focusing on one minor factor of that point, very trollish of you.
BrianX: That is true, I did make the wrong choice in hindsight, but learning from mistakes is a part of life.
Also, what I meant by 'forced' is that, when you are in the game, you have to listen to the profanity (unless you press escape and then miss all the story). With the sex scenes you have options, you don't HAVE to sleep with anyone, at least not in the parts that I played. Its not that I hate sex, its just that I felt it was tacky and pointless (in Fable it makes more sense to me). But at least I could chose, within the game, not to bed every girl (although those grannies looked pretty hot!!!).
So because of your shortsightedness, CPDRed should change a game that is already 4 years old, just to suit your particular sensibilities? No, I'm pretty sure the proper response is you should read the label before you buy next time.
BrianX: That is actually a good question. I don't think it would actually hurt, but there would have to be limits in order for a game to be sold. In my opinion, MOST people would decrease rather than increase the levels of nudity and profanity, especially if the game already had high levels of it (which begs the question, what is a high level and what is not?!).
I think it would depend on the game. I could see a game where you could increase the amount of guns, monsters, etc, but would it really serve the game if you could increase the amount of nudity and profanity? Maybe if it were a GTA game.
I think most people download those MODs because of curiosity or for a good laugh, then they uninstall it and go back to either vanilla or useful MODs that enhance the game-play.
Then again, you MIGHT download the extra nudity MOD to say, Oblivion, if a certain beach or continent had people that wore little clothing. I think context is key here; you can see where it fits in the universe of Conan rather than GTA.
Wow, I've seen some clueless stuff posted here before, but this takes the cake. You seriously believe that if given the option to decrease or increase the amount of profanity, sex and nudity in a game from the default, that more people are going to choose to decrease? You don't know anything at all about human nature, do you?