Posted September 29, 2008
I believe that some games just do not need sequels. More than that - sometimes developers create plot so.... complete, that making continuation will only do things worse. For example (SPOILERS):
Baldur's Gate 3 - I can't imagine plot of BG3. Throne of Bhaal ends this storyline - Bhaalspawn has power equal to gods, every character has his own "what happened after"... there is no "to be continued" option like in BG1. The only possible way to continue this series is to make entirely new main character... but that is something I definitelly do not want.
Legacy of Kain (Soul Reaver 3 or Defiance 2) - same as above. Elder God is dead, Raziel is merged with Reaver. For me Defiance is a perfect complacement of this series.
Arcanum 2 -it's the same case as Fallout 3. Made by different group of people, 3D graphics, first person perspective, console-style gameplay. Arcanum is my all-time favourite and I don't want this legend to be destroyed.
Post your types & discuss.
Baldur's Gate 3 - I can't imagine plot of BG3. Throne of Bhaal ends this storyline - Bhaalspawn has power equal to gods, every character has his own "what happened after"... there is no "to be continued" option like in BG1. The only possible way to continue this series is to make entirely new main character... but that is something I definitelly do not want.
Legacy of Kain (Soul Reaver 3 or Defiance 2) - same as above. Elder God is dead, Raziel is merged with Reaver. For me Defiance is a perfect complacement of this series.
Arcanum 2 -it's the same case as Fallout 3. Made by different group of people, 3D graphics, first person perspective, console-style gameplay. Arcanum is my all-time favourite and I don't want this legend to be destroyed.
Post your types & discuss.
Post edited September 29, 2008 by wojciechfelczak