chautemoc: It was more an explanation in light of the leak, so people would not have misled perceptions.
Not necessarily. First of all - many people (myself included) believe, that the first "leak", was perfectly intentional, and was supposed to interest potential publishers and create "buzz" around the title. The second one was probably true however, and wasn't meant for public.
The first "leak" had place in September. Then they kept announcing the announcement, and stating how important this project is. They last announced it at the beginning of March I think (that they will announce the game at the end of March :P).
And everyone already knows about it, so, for me at least, the rationality of this strategy is questionable.
chautemoc: Re: Atari, they convinced them to use only a disk check so it's not beyond reason.
Atari went crazy with DRM around the time of releasing Assault on Dark Athena. That's about 8 months after the Witcher:EE.
chautemoc: I see what you mean about seeking a new publisher. Nevertheless, could be a million reasons they're no longer with Atari, many of which could me amicable.
I agree - there is no way we can find out the whole story behind it. I'm still somewhat surprised that in their current state Atari is still not here, but that may indicate that the parting was not a pleasant one.
chautemoc: Arkham came out before they merged I think...
Also tons of publishers go to Steam but not here. Like LucasArts..
Arkham came about the same time that the merging occurred - unlike Just Cause 2 ;).
I'm just saying that the merger itself shouldn't be seen as potential problem for Eidos titles to be published here (or anywhere else).
And after Activision nothing will surprise me.
