B1tF1ghter: People who are interested in the factual accuracy of your "anti-woke" accusations against me can easily back-track into my previous posts to read my exact words, devoid of any of your misinterpretations.
You're right. You defined yourself as anti-woke. It's in black and white. The internet never forgets.
B1tF1ghter: And yes, people SHOULD be judged based on what they say publicly on platforms such as Twitter
So formerly the most powerful man on Earth has some of the most controversial, misinformed, unlawful and dumb takes on social media. And he might become the most powerful man on Earth soon again. If people are going to enforce this "private social media posts should interfere with and impact your work life" then it should be equal to everyone. All or nothing.
rojimboo: That's conclusive evidence that the article is full of factual inaccuracies.
B1tF1ghter: No. That, and NUMEROUS OTHER TWEETS, are evidence
So personal tweets are proof of factual inaccuracies in the Kotaku article? Of which you have named none, zero, zilch? Got it. Actually no, I will keep treating Twitter/X as the ultimate cesspool of hate and misinformation it is, thank you very much.
B1tF1ghter: So why even hire "a consultant on REAL WORLD subjects" if "it's ALL fiction"?
Oh, that's right, because it's not.
And the moment they want to put real-life stuff in, you know, an average person would "probably" want that stuff inserted to be accurate and neutral, not a biased take.
Wait. You think Alan Wake 2, Spider-Man 2 and God of War Ragnarök are REAL WORLD subjects? Ok then.
B1tF1ghter: You will have a hard time finding people online who respond to EVERY SINGLE sentence out of a long message.
It seems you read too hastily, no surprise there. I didn't say, imply or mandate that people should "respond to EVERY SINGLE sentence" of a comment. I told you it was dishonest and arguing in bad faith when you only reply to and quote words or phrases from singular sentences out of singular paragraphs, omitting the rest of the sentence and statement that would have changed or explained the meaning completely well. Only for you to be able to comment something remotely reasonable without losing face. That's sad.
B1tF1ghter: Go ahead and provide your own argumentation defending the actions of SBI on social media. Including but not limited to their very public, very archived, Twitter posts.
ALSO feel free to defend the CEO of SBI after their GDC talk ( assuming you even watched it ).
Look, it's very simple, maybe you will finally understand. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim, especially a strong one, that they doubled down on. You? You have repeatedly stated that Sweet Baby Inc. inserts diverse characters to fictitious games to their detriment and adds "artificial" writing (whatever the fck that means) and bs to them. I asked: "Could you please show when and where SBI did that, with some verifiable facts or evidence or reasoning or anything to back you up?". You provided nothing.
You? You have repeatedly claimed how full of factual inaccuracies Kotaku is, especially this investigative article into GamersGate2.0 harassment, and that Kotaku's downfall can be easily seen. I asked when and where can you see this? What are the factual inaccuracies in the article? You provided nothing.
The only thing you provided after several very long walls of text, is some singular personal tweet from a singular Kotaku journalist, as if that was proof of factual inaccuracies in the article.
Indeed, the only thing that you seem to object to, is wokeness, wherever you perceive it supposedly. You are the definition of anti-woke, and you don't even seem aware of it. That's sad.
If you had backed up anything you constantly claimed, then this discussion would have been a lot shorter. I basically called you out on your bs, and I was right, you pulled the allegations out of your ass because you couldn't stand them being opposed to your world view. How dare they invade your safe space with forced diversity and inclusion, am I right? I mean, look at Alan Wake 2, how dare they put in a black woman protagonist into a Finnish game, and with such a Nordic name? Surely she should be blonde and white and a viking? Right? Artificial slop, it was. Boo Sweet Baby Inc. Boo Kotaku for reporting on it. Let's boycott them, throw in some harassment maybe for good measure. /s
B1tF1ghter: I AM NOT GETTING PAID FOR THIS S**T.
You clearly should be. Nobody masters inane drivel whilst saying nothing, quite like you. It's quite a talent, really.