Posted November 06, 2017
Nah, I think I'll hold on to it a while longer.
But you won't?
More interesting is that you completely omitted the "why" both when quoting my question and when answering it.
As is that you also ignored my question about Bookwyrm627.
I have to wonder how you know that to be a fact, if you're town.
You didn't just say what I think you did, did you now? And did you realise that you did? I mean for someone trying hard to not clear up the game state.
Heh. Not sure which is funnier, if not a bit insulting - that you seem to attempt to make me think you're that naive, or that you seem to attempt to make me think that you think I'm that naive...
Curious, it's telling in what way exactly?
Seriously? For all the rereading you've been doing, and all the conclusions you've reached, you will have to do your due diligence? After I bring the subject to the table? Looks like "I'm scum-reading so and so, here's a vote" is indeed sufficient reason for you; it really can't get simpler than this.
You surely make me question your motivation, and in turn your alignment.
But you won't?
Krypsyn: [...] Which time? *shrug* Doesn't matter; I already answered it. Midway through Day 1, and after Day 2 ended, respectively. [...]
Was my question really confusing, given that you stated the timing and reason for the switch back? But let's say I should have made it clearer - my question was about when and why you changed your initial scum-read. More interesting is that you completely omitted the "why" both when quoting my question and when answering it.
As is that you also ignored my question about Bookwyrm627.
Krypsyn: [...] My therapist suggested I try new things and be more open about my feelings. Or, perhaps that was just the voices in my head; I don't think I actually have a 'therapist'.
No idea. I try not to get too involved in my own life. Boundaries, you know.
I see you're rebouncing; hmm, hmm, hmm... No idea. I try not to get too involved in my own life. Boundaries, you know.
gogtrial34987: Agreed. And good thing, too, as me being cleared as town wouldn't be a good thing for town, now would it? [...]
It most certainly wouldn't, but I find it interesting that you omit the parts of my post that express exactly that, and clearly try to have me in the defensive by keeping the focus on me. I have to wonder how you know that to be a fact, if you're town.
You didn't just say what I think you did, did you now? And did you realise that you did? I mean for someone trying hard to not clear up the game state.
gogtrial34987: [...] But I've learned to opt for the simpler solution.)
There aren't slips or mistakes to point to, but I've felt your questioning and followthrough to have been lacking. I know you as much sharper when you're town. [...]
Then you are in for a big surprise. And at the risk of sounding rude - shame you seem as short-sighted as a couple of others. If you're town, that is. And especially if you're doing what I thought you might be doing as town. There aren't slips or mistakes to point to, but I've felt your questioning and followthrough to have been lacking. I know you as much sharper when you're town. [...]
Heh. Not sure which is funnier, if not a bit insulting - that you seem to attempt to make me think you're that naive, or that you seem to attempt to make me think that you think I'm that naive...
Curious, it's telling in what way exactly?
Seriously? For all the rereading you've been doing, and all the conclusions you've reached, you will have to do your due diligence? After I bring the subject to the table? Looks like "I'm scum-reading so and so, here's a vote" is indeed sufficient reason for you; it really can't get simpler than this.
You surely make me question your motivation, and in turn your alignment.