Ancient-Red-Dragon: The allegations that Zoom may be selling warez got me curious to get to the bottom of this matter.
That search led me to this link:
https://www.gog.com/upload/forum/2020/05/bc6cc244ee90d9677304f51738db36aaaffc13c6.png If the sort of issue that the Zoom employee there is talking about is what led to the warez allegations arising, then it seems to me that those allegations are unfounded.
The Zoom guy is correct with what he said there: it's the publisher's fault if they are telling Zoom that they have the legal right to sell a game even if they actually don't.
Should that situation occur, then that's not Zoom's fault.
Some of the posts in this thread make it sound like Zoom just randomly puts up any game that they feel like onto their store, without having first had any contact with the IP holders of that game.
But that scenario would be an untrue twisting of reality, in the event that it was fabricated as an offshoot of the quotation cited in the link above.
Hmm, hope you got more info than that. As asking the suspect's opinion is more or less useless.
So still I would only trust zoom if the games rights holders say, they gave the rights to them to sell those games on their behalf.
kohlrak: Actually, Zoom would be wrong on that from my understanding from other topics ("Selling stolen property" for example). However, Zoom might be in the clear, but they might have to remove copies from peoples' libraries. Most courts, even if they're in the wrong, would end up only allowing an injunction (to remove game from downloads/accounts) unless the copyright holders could prove they knew the licenses expired, which is a tough case to prove.
Yeah, I think the seller has the responsibility to make sure what they sell is legal.