It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
kohlrak: If it is so, i want to know what it is. I don't see anything particularly profound or easy to use in steam's API compared to other alternatives out there that don't require steam.
avatar
BKGaming: Right. I'm not going to spend much time trying to go over all of what Steamworks offers, but in a general sense it's not any one thing where you can't doing something similar with alternatives, it's that Steam offers eveything in a nice neat easy to use package so why would any sane developer want to spend time trying to come up with alternatives. Could a dev use a third party, maybe open source MP service for instance? Sure, but why do that when Steam offers easy enough API to tap into that offers direct integration with a Steam account (that nearly every gamer has), friends list on the most popular service on PC, and a potection system (ie VAC) that will protect your game from cheaters all together in one service.

It's other not so obvious features like Steampipe, where you can instantly upload patches and create branches for beta's ect without having to code an integrated patch system inside the game.

It's the Steam ecosystem which includes Steamworks. It's big picture mode, it's steam link, it's the inventory system, it trading cards. These things make looking for alternatives redundant and a waste of money / time.

The only way to compete with that is by having an ecosystem that is also easy to use. That also allows direct integration. That also provides similar functionality.

If developers have to splice together a butch of different alternatives from multiple sources to create a similar experience or have to create their own solutions there just not going to waste the time, especially at GOG where the user base is already tiny in comparison.
Yeah, but the devs also have to accept that they're also beholden to steam and stuck with steam just as much as their customers. You think that'd be worth something, especially when not all those features are being used. Especially with this talk of steam possibly kicking games off (a very specific niche, i know, but it should still be a factor) as well as devs feeling unable to get going on steam due to the pure level of saturation of steam's market, you'd think these devs would understand the need to be able to be independent of steam.
A user on /r/games created this wishlist asking gog to at least warn us of these games. Feel free to vote it!
avatar
Neurus_Ex: A user on /r/games created this wishlist asking gog to at least warn us of these games. Feel free to vote it!
Eh, I already created this wishlist about this topic 2 years ago, but GOG never cared, even with 860 votes so far.. :\
Post edited May 30, 2018 by phaolo
avatar
Neurus_Ex: A user on /r/games created this wishlist asking gog to at least warn us of these games. Feel free to vote it!
avatar
phaolo: Eh, I already created this wishlist about this topic 2 years ago, but GOG never cared, even with 860 votes so far.. :\
Oh, got no idea about it. You already got my vote. When I arrive home after work I'll link to it on both threads. Thanks for pointing it out!
Speaking of votes, I created a feature wishlist today asking GOG to warn us of missing or disabled features. It's starting to get some traction. Feel free to add your +1 if you want.

https://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/warn_us_of_games_with_missing_or_disabled_features
avatar
Pinball: Speaking of votes, I created a feature wishlist today asking GOG to warn us of missing or disabled features. It's starting to get some traction. Feel free to add your +1 if you want.

https://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/warn_us_of_games_with_missing_or_disabled_features
The truth about all this is that it's unrealistic. Not only would GOG get into so much trouble, but GOG can't afford to devote personnel to the task. On the flip side, I wonder if we could go directly for the companies themselves via the tort route, and get an injunction on the companies to "reasonably support equally on all platforms." Would cover humble and others to take the heat off GOG, too.
avatar
kohlrak: The truth about all this is that it's unrealistic. Not only would GOG get into so much trouble, but GOG can't afford to devote personnel to the task. On the flip side, I wonder if we could go directly for the companies themselves via the tort route, and get an injunction on the companies to "reasonably support equally on all platforms." Would cover humble and others to take the heat off GOG, too.
I think they'll just ignore any message we send them, it's always been like that.
Post edited June 01, 2018 by .Bach
avatar
kohlrak: The truth about all this is that it's unrealistic. Not only would GOG get into so much trouble, but GOG can't afford to devote personnel to the task. On the flip side, I wonder if we could go directly for the companies themselves via the tort route, and get an injunction on the companies to "reasonably support equally on all platforms." Would cover humble and others to take the heat off GOG, too.
avatar
.Bach: I think they'll just ignore any message we send them, it's always been like that.
Kinda hard to ignore a lawyer. If you've been handed a summons and fail to show, you get sued ex parte automatically in most countries, IIRC. But, i'm really not sure if there's legal ground.