Posted February 11, 2018
toxicTom: Why is Feast for Crow considered bad? They get slower, yes, that might piss some people off. So far IMO the books gained with each iteration, both in style and meaning.
Cavalary: Too slow and too little action I'd say, plus the odd split according to location instead of time, which then gets even messier in book 5 since you have both location and time, with some things being at the same time as book 4 and some after. Also, in a number of ways, perhaps they shock less. They're outstanding in terms of worldbuilding and scope, but in terms of things actually happening, not so much, and readers also got used to more in this aspect from the first 3 books. Plus, while the scope itself makes the whole series require quite some effort to follow, the way books 4 and 5 are split and the action being spread out so thin likely makes that even worse.
Just trying to analyze, at least, not that I actually checked what reasons others give.
What was 1000x better was the Cersei/Margaery/Sparrows showdown. A lot more interesting than the travesty we got in the TV show. *Sigh*
Then Book 5 does advance the story, but not enough because it is too widely spread between dozens of point-of-view characters.
Post edited February 11, 2018 by Caesar.