It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
The Witcher 3: Wild HuntPatch waiting on consoles.(81 posts)(81 posts)
(81 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
This is my favourite topic
Posted July 13, 2015
avatar
Brashen: [wall of text]
Good sir, you already stated you would stop posting in this thread. A man should keep his word!
Posted July 13, 2015
avatar
Brashen: [wall of text]
avatar
fjdgshdkeavd: Good sir, you already stated you would stop posting in this thread. A man should keep his word!
Really? Because I defended myself from a verbal attack?

This is the best you can come up with?

Why am I not surprised?
Posted July 13, 2015
avatar
Brashen: Ok, I'm getting bored with this.

You've made no point. You've repeated the same statement several times now. Remember, the original contention in our debate (and I use that term very loosely) was wether the developer had implied the patch release. There was never any argument as to wether they had actually stated the release would occur. In an earlier post I had pointed toward customer perspective as being a factor when developers communicate. I would expect this to be common knowledge, but this assumption may be incorrect. It obviously is incorrect in this case anyway.

You have offered no reasoning why customer perspective should not be considered nor offered any opposing argument other than to continue to repeat what you believe with no supporting logic.

Math is easy. 2 + 2 = 4

Language has many nuances which I won't even attempt to detail here.

You have repeatedly shown an inability to debate. You get your wish. I'm done posting to this thread.
avatar
stevezy: What if it is common core math? you know . . . 2+2=5
Well if it's common core you may still get 2+2 =4 but it will take you 1-2 hours to do it. Common core does not allow any memorized answers. So common core would do something like this, and I'm being dead serious here:

First comvert the 2 to a base ten. Then break down the base ten into two rgoups of 5. Since 2 is less than five you need to create another group where you will use to take away from the other group. Then convert the answer back to base ten with still another group to show you how many you needed dto include to get to base ten. Now resplit these into groups of five and subtgract the take away amount to arrive at the final answer of 4.
Posted July 13, 2015
avatar
Brashen: I'm done posting to this thread.
You cannot stay away! The intellectual debate is too rewarding!
Posted July 15, 2015
avatar
GrayBlondie: You're making things up now. You posted this:

"Did CDPR not mean to imply this? Could language/translation issues all play a part? Certainly possible."

This could possibly be what you mean by referring to customer perspective being considered. That's a stretch. No other reference to this "customer perspective" you apparently mentioned. My guess is they considered the perspective of a customer who read what they actually wrote and who didn't assume more.

What it boils down to is this:
CDPR said we'll release a changelog this week. They also said no DLC because we're hard at work making this patch.
We got our changelog.
You're mad because you ASSUMED patch was to be released this week. You shouldn't have. There was no basis for assuming this. Now you can't admit you shouldn't have assumed this. Is this logic simple enough for you? Or did I lose again by making an actual point?

Go ahead and tell me how complex language is again though, I'm sure literally everyone else missed the secret meaning they laced into their simple statement. Their words matched their actions. You can't ask much more from a company.

Glad you're going to spout ignorance elsewhere. This has been a riot.
avatar
Brashen: Nope, not making things up. My assertion on customer perspective was made on page 3 of this thread. I didn't use the word perspective so I'm sure that's why you can't find it. Given your many exemplified inadequacies I have no doubt context is lost on you as well.

You remind me of something my mom used to say...

you can't argue with a fool.
Maybe you could post content for once and quote your assertion. I offered a possibility that was quite a stretch. You've also again failed to address any of the points I've made regarding your ridiculous assumption.

And on top of that you didn't keep your word to stop posting. That's a real shame because your complete lack of anything useful to say is clogging up what could be a useful forum to some people.
Posted July 15, 2015
avatar
Brashen: Nope, not making things up. My assertion on customer perspective was made on page 3 of this thread. I didn't use the word perspective so I'm sure that's why you can't find it. Given your many exemplified inadequacies I have no doubt context is lost on you as well.

You remind me of something my mom used to say...

you can't argue with a fool.
avatar
GrayBlondie: Maybe you could post content for once and quote your assertion. I offered a possibility that was quite a stretch. You've also again failed to address any of the points I've made regarding your ridiculous assumption.

And on top of that you didn't keep your word to stop posting. That's a real shame because your complete lack of anything useful to say is clogging up what could be a useful forum to some people.
let's agree you both are a pain in the arse
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
This is my favourite topic
Community
The Witcher 3: Wild HuntPatch waiting on consoles.(81 posts)(81 posts)
(81 posts)