It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
The Witcher 3: Wild HuntNG+ is the next dlc!(21 posts)(21 posts)
(21 posts)
Pages:
1
2
This is my favourite topic
Posted July 28, 2015
If it was EA marketing style, then you would have to pay 9.99 euro for the quest DLCs INDIVIDUALLY and 2.99 for the cosmetic DLCs INDIVIDUALLY. People, stop being ungrateful. The ONLY thing monetized was the game guide. Everything else is a gift.

I don't know about you, but when i get a gift, i say thanks and take it. No one was obligated to give us all this extra content and especially, to give it to us for FREE. This company is the ONLY which does so. They could monetize the DLC just fine and THEN people would have a valid reason to nag. Or they could release and sell the game as is, then sell a GOTY version of it but WITHOUT free upgrade to it, force players pay extra, EXACTLY like others do (like Bethesda, fallout 3 and goty fallout 3, for example).

Get real.
Posted July 28, 2015
Well, tbh, I don't know if I'll even finish the main game until the expansion pass arrives. So maybe a NG+ won't be such a bad thing, coupled with the expansions...
Posted July 28, 2015
What a waste. FOV slider would have been more exciting..
Posted July 28, 2015
avatar
Nirth: What a waste. FOV slider would have been more exciting..
DLCs are not for graphics settings, but for gameplay addition/modification and cosmetic stuff.
Posted July 28, 2015
"If it was EA marketing style, then you would have to pay 9.99 euro for the quest DLCs INDIVIDUALLY and 2.99 for the cosmetic DLCs INDIVIDUALLY."

And you may even have to buy for 15 euros of "points" to pay the 9.99+2.99 and stay forever with 2.02 euros worth of points...

BUT, as far as I know, you don't have 3 differents hair color for Ciri at the end of TW3. With an EA game you'll have 3 distinct endings. The blue, the green and the red for example (and with a DLC one year later, you can have the colorless ending, for FREE!).

So, don't you dare saying something nasty against EA.

huh... that's just what I did...
sorry :-)
Posted July 28, 2015
avatar
KiNgBrAdLeY7: If it was EA marketing style, then you would have to pay 9.99 euro for the quest DLCs INDIVIDUALLY and 2.99 for the cosmetic DLCs INDIVIDUALLY. People, stop being ungrateful. The ONLY thing monetized was the game guide. Everything else is a gift.

I don't know about you, but when i get a gift, i say thanks and take it. No one was obligated to give us all this extra content and especially, to give it to us for FREE. This company is the ONLY which does so. They could monetize the DLC just fine and THEN people would have a valid reason to nag. Or they could release and sell the game as is, then sell a GOTY version of it but WITHOUT free upgrade to it, force players pay extra, EXACTLY like others do (like Bethesda, fallout 3 and goty fallout 3, for example).

Get real.
This!

Even though it should be mentioned that sometimes the devs don't have enough time left to finish certain quests (and stuff like that) and therefore this stuff ends up being cut from the game. Thus DLCs offer the opportunity to finish games later on.
Pages:
1
2
This is my favourite topic
Community
The Witcher 3: Wild HuntNG+ is the next dlc!(21 posts)(21 posts)
(21 posts)