Why would anyone kill Letho; he is the last of the school of the Viper, and all he wants to do is go back and live in a witcher school, training the people who kill monsters. Now, if there isn't a more noble cause, I don't know what.

On Sile, I let her live, since I thought she will be useful to me in the third game, maybe protect me at some point, or give me some useful info.

I killed the dragon, to put it out of its misery. When was the last time something impaled by a giant tree got up and survived?

.
.
.
It will survive in this game lol apparently dragons heal very quickly.

Maybe il go back and change that choice, I really liked that dragon, even though it tried to kill me, it wasn't really its self.

.
.
Which path were you on?

Noble cause haha i dont know about that. He might just mises having friends and to a witcher, only another witcher can become friend.(freaks by nature) but well it doesnt change the fact that he wants to build a school to kill monster so yeah

Sile...so no one out there actually think meat splashing on you is bad :\ ?

Seem dragon here like werewolf can only be finished off by silver haha What scares me is that she can get back to human form thus revealing a hole through her chest, still, she chats with Geralt.

I am guessing Roche since he referred tot he dragon as 'it' in which case only 2 options are available to him. it's best not to spoil in this case, but believe me when I say if you play the Iorveth path, saving or killing the dragon takes on a whole new level

Roche, and rescue the girl, but i've heard the spoiler.

It's interesting, actually, that depending on what you do about the dragon, you heard different tidbits of info. If you decide to kill it, you realize that it was the last dragon alive, and that you just killed it, though it was irrevocably controlled by the Lodge.

If you leave it, you hear that they heal fast.

<3 CDPR!

You're kidding. Who don't like that young a dragon. It even has puppy eyes !!! nvm the fact the eye is bigger than your head
I would glady let the dragon burn the city down than kill it. Why? HELL WAS BREAKING LOOSE IN THERE - the raped and tortured victims CURRENTLY HAPPENING in the city would be saved, in a sense and the rapist and torturers all killed


btw

It is not the last dragon alive. There is still a golden dragon farting around

which is her father.

this is a spoiler thread, it's in the topic name lol.

continuing the whole Dragon thing... Iorveth's path, the choice is super easy. Reverse the spell, it's a no brainer for me, it was the best for everyone involved (well, except Philippa, but pffft). On Roche's side, it's trickier if you already know what's really going on in that situation, though probably less tricky if you don't know. You only have 2 options available to you, kill her, or let her live a thrall. if you let her live, it's conceivable that in time you could break the spell, but there's no telling how much damage Philippa (and Sile, if you let her live) could do with her pet dragon in that time. If you kill her it could be seen as an act of mercy.

Which is why i told you read the mood >_>

My goodness, spoilers in a spoiler thread?!

Good god man, think of the children! xD

I would rather let the dragon burn the city of sins as an act of mercy.
"The knights raped two sorceresses" - just that line alone make me want to kill the whole order of knights
I was talking about letting me have to fun of spoiling instead cuz i started it lol