It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
The Witcher 2What did you do with Sile? *Endgame SPOILERS*(158 posts)(158 posts)
(158 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
This is my favourite topic
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
GoodGuyA: I saved her because I didn't know I could do otherwise. Just assumed I had to because she kept screaming after 10 seconds. I'm impatient, it seems.

Letho, I let him live. Hardest decision in the entire game. I realized that more blood shed on that day would make it only more brutal, and I trust his word for some reason. I don't expect to see him again, at least as an enemy.
Hardest decision? Thats exaggerating haha
the only hard decision should be whether to cure saskia or save triss (destroying part of the empire army, on top of a general and the vile Shilard

Letho waited to answer your questions and enlight your past just for you to kill him :\?
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
iamin7ove: Hardest decision? Thats exaggerating haha
There's no point to killing Letho unless you're really that righteous about it. I'm one who didn't kill the king because it wouldn't have un-raped Ves. What's Letho's done is done, and after so much in the aftermath there was no need to kill him especially when he was so cooperative. It's a preference of honor versus the practicality of the situation. He did what he felt he had to, and I choosing whether to begrudge him for that was difficult to me.
Post edited May 31, 2011 by GoodGuyA
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
ArysDayne: I played through the game on Iorveths side. Saskia is presented as the perfect monarch there. Trying to create a land where everyone, human or not, common or noble is treated equally.
And then Phillipa and Sile mindcontrol her into helping them with their stupid world domination scheme. Sorry Sile, you're not going to get away with that!
The dragon part is actually what makes her perfect the most haha
Swring a big enoguh stick andyou dont have to be loud to be heard
avatar
iamin7ove: Hardest decision? Thats exaggerating haha
avatar
GoodGuyA: There's no point to killing Letho unless you're really that righteous about it. I'm one who didn't kill the king because it wouldn't have un-raped Ves. What's Letho's done is done, and after so much in the aftermath there was no need to kill him especially when he was so cooperative. It's a preference of honor versus the practicality of the situation. He did what he felt he had to, and I choosing whether to begrudge him for that was difficult to me.
Agree. To kill Letho just means you're a justice freak and doesn't really care much about feelings. You would kill someone that kept your 2 gfs safe because u didn't like his ways of bussiness
Post edited May 31, 2011 by iamin7ove
Posted May 31, 2011
letho's a capable agent of nilfgaard and would prove valuable in their incursion into the north. kill him and deny nilfgaard a very capable assassin.
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
soldiergeralt: letho's a capable agent of nilfgaard and would prove valuable in their incursion into the north. kill him and deny nilfgaard a very capable assassin.
Letho was not really working for Nilggaard, Letho pretty much only works for Letho. He was using them like he used pretty much everyone else, to get what he wanted, in this case to help save his witcher school.
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
soldiergeralt: letho's a capable agent of nilfgaard and would prove valuable in their incursion into the north. kill him and deny nilfgaard a very capable assassin.
avatar
Snarfinator: Letho was not really working for Nilggaard, Letho pretty much only works for Letho. He was using them like he used pretty much everyone else, to get what he wanted, in this case to help save his witcher school.
True, but the emperor has a much larger hold over Letho than the Lodge/Sile or Iorvoth did, and therefore I see him as still dangerous to the Northern Kingdoms. The emperor may drag his feet on rebuilding the school of the Viper, and even if he doesn't Letho is still indebted to him in a way that I don't think he is going to be able to keep any neutrality. Therefore I've killed him both times, even if he is telling the truth and he was Geralt's friend at one point, he is dangerous.

And (in my more neutral-Witcher game) he is not following the Path well, he is getting too involved in politics and helping Nilfgaard for a Witcher; and (in my more involved/siding with Upper Aedirn-Witcher game) he is an ally of Nilfgaard, the enemy of the North, who I am defending.
Posted May 31, 2011
I personally don't think Letho owes anybody. He paid his debt off to both Geralt and the Emperor through his services. He finally got the chance to sit down with Geralt and reveal every last thing to him. Not only will the emperor be going down soon enough, but Letho really has no business going after the remaining kings. They'll practically kill each other.
Posted May 31, 2011
So nobody noticed that when you save Sile, she tells Geralt where Yennefer is located?
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
Soylent: So nobody noticed that when you save Sile, she tells Geralt where Yennefer is located?
Letho tells you all about that like right after she does, though, and in much more detail. Doesn't seem like something that would factor in much.
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
Soylent: So nobody noticed that when you save Sile, she tells Geralt where Yennefer is located?
You cant use a candy to pay a heavy loan
avatar
GoodGuyA: I personally don't think Letho owes anybody. He paid his debt off to both Geralt and the Emperor through his services. He finally got the chance to sit down with Geralt and reveal every last thing to him. Not only will the emperor be going down soon enough, but Letho really has no business going after the remaining kings. They'll practically kill each other.
He and the emperor just have a bussiness exchange, not a debt or anything
He would destroy the north in any way in exchange for the school of viper to be restored

Frankly, it was all just bussiness.
avatar
soldiergeralt: letho's a capable agent of nilfgaard and would prove valuable in their incursion into the north. kill him and deny nilfgaard a very capable assassin.
avatar
Snarfinator: Letho was not really working for Nilggaard, Letho pretty much only works for Letho. He was using them like he used pretty much everyone else, to get what he wanted, in this case to help save his witcher school.
Gosh..he worked for the Emperor means he works for Nilfggard >_> the restoration of the school is his pay
Post edited May 31, 2011 by iamin7ove
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
Soylent: So nobody noticed that when you save Sile, she tells Geralt where Yennefer is located?
avatar
iamin7ove: You cant use a candy to pay a heavy loan
avatar
GoodGuyA: I personally don't think Letho owes anybody. He paid his debt off to both Geralt and the Emperor through his services. He finally got the chance to sit down with Geralt and reveal every last thing to him. Not only will the emperor be going down soon enough, but Letho really has no business going after the remaining kings. They'll practically kill each other.
avatar
iamin7ove: He and the emperor just have a bussiness exchange, not a debt or anything
He would destroy the north in any way in exchange for the school of viper to be restored

Frankly, it was all just bussiness.
avatar
Snarfinator: Letho was not really working for Nilggaard, Letho pretty much only works for Letho. He was using them like he used pretty much everyone else, to get what he wanted, in this case to help save his witcher school.
avatar
iamin7ove: Gosh..he worked for the Emperor means he works for Nilfggard >_> the restoration of the school is his pay
.
.
Using your logic he worked for Iorvath as well. He did what he needed to get what he wanted, after that he himself said he was done working with the emperor.
Posted May 31, 2011
Frankly, Letho is a bussiness man. He works for a lot of people but he just doesn't have loyalty.
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
iamin7ove: Frankly, Letho is a bussiness man. He works for a lot of people but he just doesn't have loyalty.
.
.
Sorta like another Witcher we all know LOL.
Posted May 31, 2011
avatar
iamin7ove: Frankly, Letho is a bussiness man. He works for a lot of people but he just doesn't have loyalty.
avatar
Snarfinator: .
.
Sorta like another Witcher we all know LOL.
True that LOL
Except that Letho is more emotional about comradeship.
Geralt would kill Roche if he stands in his way but Letho didn't kill Geralt.

And somehow i can easily imagine Letho having a warm family
can't with Geralt tho. The closest of what's called family to Geralt is Ciri trained as a witcher at 11 and works with highwaymen when she was 16
Post edited May 31, 2011 by iamin7ove
Posted June 01, 2011
I agree if you mean Letho having a warm family.......for dinner. The guy is a monsterous, juiced up, no neck assassin. Not real sure why people are having a problem with whether or not to off him.

I don't think Geralt knew what he was saving from the Slyzard, he should of just walked away.

Pretty sure he waited for Geralt because of how easily he man-handled him earlier in the game and thought he would do so again.
Post edited June 01, 2011 by Jeffro
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
This is my favourite topic
Community
The Witcher 2What did you do with Sile? *Endgame SPOILERS*(158 posts)(158 posts)
(158 posts)