CatShannon: I haven't noticed any significant changes yet with patch 1.1. But then again, I hadn't had any problems with the game (GOG version) in it's original state other than I couldn't download and install the troll contract. I only applied the patch for that.
I haven't played the game really since then though.
[off topic]
jlibster: [...](I tell people just build a LInux box if you want Mac)
CatShannon: Huh, how's that? They are both totally different, with different aims and goals.
Nice tech-talk here btw.. I have just ordered a couple of new core component and will put myself a new computer together. It's not that I really need it but... well, I can afford it at the moment. And yeah, of course I like to see how the new computer will handle the Witcher 2.
In fact, the game was really the reason me starting to look into new hardware. Again, it's not really that I need it. The Witcher 2 may not run perfect on my current machine, but it does run okay. But there's also my fascination for computer stuff. And I really enjoy building PCs (for myself). It's like LEGO for grown-ups. x-D
Unfortunately, it also loses it's fascination just as quickly. As soon as a new machine is set up, it becomes ordinary, almost boring again. But at least for a short period I'll enjoy the new hardware. And what would life be without these little moments. x-D
[/off topic]
To answer your first question. the MacOS is far more similar to Linux that you may realize. (with the exception that Linux/BSD wasn't made to generate cash) Did you ever wonder (or perhaps you didn't know) why you could install virtually ANY linux software into the MacOS simply by compiling the SAME source code so long as you've installed all the dependent libraries by the same means? You can't do that with MS Windows, even if you have all the compilers, it wouln't compile. Do the words "sudo", "vim", "bash" or "Apache" sound familiar to you? If you are MacOS user you should. They are linux/Unix tools in the MacOS. Heck Linux and MacOS have virtually the same file permissions schema and near identical directory structures (linux and BSD distro sometimes have minor variations in core directory structures) I got to learn the MacOS (or should I say BSD OS) anatomy in detail when I starting using a G4 as my portable work environment. The MacOS is in fact a customized BSD OS distro with a refined X-Windows manager (X-windows is another Linux component) and a specialized packing system (before the deb package system was created and RPM was not really refined). BSD OS, like Linux, was derived from Unix. Unlike Linux which is GPL, the BSD OS license allowed people customizing without publish the source to the community which you cannot legally do in Linux, which is GPL. Apple took extreme advantage of the BSD community and their liberal licensing by taking it, making a great GUI, making a ton of money, and not giving the source code for the benefit of the community. (would have help Linux GUI evolve a lot quicker, which I imagine was the last thing Apple wanted)
In many ways Linux distros like Ubuntu, Debian or OpenSUSE have MORE functionality and certainly more freedom than the MacOS, is easier to install, more software with the deb or rpm packaging systems/community, and you can use ANY hardware you want (that is Linux compatible and that list has gotten HUGE). You can make Linux X-Windows behave virtually IDENTICAL to the MacOS (tried it for awhile and went back to default). As for software, as I said, easier to install more software, and sometimes more powerful/versitile than what you would pay $30--$900 for to run specifically in the MacOS. This is why I tell people if you want the macOS, better to get Linux; (Photoshop=GIMP/gimpshop, AppleOffice=LibreOffice, Muse=MuseScore, 3d graphics=Blender, Illustrator=Stencil, Garage=audacity, Itunes=Amarok, Rhythmbox or Banshee. MacDVD = VLC, VirtualPC=VirtualBox...I could go on and on and on) The biggest reason telling people who want the MacOS to get Linux is you can use BETTER hardware. Since Apple had their little spat with IBM (who made their superior PPC cpus), Apple Laptop/Desktop construction quality AND quality of parts used has gone downhill. (too bad the prices didn't) I used to be a big Apple fan, which is why I have my Aluminum G4. So when I read reports of MacBookPro's overheating, saw the articles on how to fix it published by a fan, and Apple threaten to sue the helpful guy, I and many other considered Apple the "new evil". Reports on the new Server models came out mentioning lower grade (considerably lower than you would tolerate in your gaming system) graphics cards were now being installed in the Apple server model that cost $3k. So much for value. The desktop models weren't any better. Apple when from "State-of-the-art" hardware to "Sate-of-the-hype" once Intel hardware got introduced. One big MS style marketing machine with a better OS, and MS diirty business tactics. (so sad....) Anyway, hope that explains where I'm coming from.