Posted May 18, 2011
keropi
New User
keropi Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Greece
DPB
New User
DPB Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2009
From United Kingdom
Posted May 18, 2011
One thing I've noticed that if you're using custom settings, the maximum texture size always depends on which preset you're modifying. You can edit the User.ini too, but it's easier to just pick a preset and work from there. This way you can turn other settings off but still have great looking textures.
Also, the texture downscaling option seems to very useful on a not so good system (C2D E8400 3ghz, 9800 GTX+ 512mb, 3gb RAM). If this is set to low and using the ultra textures, the game not only looks much better than with both on low, but there's almost no performance hit at all. As far as I can tell, it doesn't touch the ground textures at all, only small objects for which having very high-res textures isn't as important.
Also, the texture downscaling option seems to very useful on a not so good system (C2D E8400 3ghz, 9800 GTX+ 512mb, 3gb RAM). If this is set to low and using the ultra textures, the game not only looks much better than with both on low, but there's almost no performance hit at all. As far as I can tell, it doesn't touch the ground textures at all, only small objects for which having very high-res textures isn't as important.
Post edited May 18, 2011 by DPB
WastedJoker
New User
WastedJoker Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From United Kingdom
Posted May 18, 2011
My settings are attached.
I basically switched shadows to Low, turned off bloom/SSAO/Ubersampling and left everythign else at Ultra.
On my rig of an overclocked Intel i7 920 (@ 3.5Ghz per core) w/ 6GB of DDR3 RAM + GTX 260's in SLI (1.8GB RAM on eachcard ) on Win7 x64, I'm getting around 40fps average in outdoor fighting scenes.
I've just installed latest beta drivers so I'll see how they go.
Links to screenies of how these settings look:
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z184/shirike/Gaming/witcher22011-05-1819-45-02-35.png
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z184/shirike/Gaming/witcher22011-05-1819-40-08-04.png
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z184/shirike/Gaming/witcher22011-05-1819-35-46-38.png
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z184/shirike/Gaming/witcher22011-05-1818-41-41-61.png
I basically switched shadows to Low, turned off bloom/SSAO/Ubersampling and left everythign else at Ultra.
On my rig of an overclocked Intel i7 920 (@ 3.5Ghz per core) w/ 6GB of DDR3 RAM + GTX 260's in SLI (1.8GB RAM on eachcard ) on Win7 x64, I'm getting around 40fps average in outdoor fighting scenes.
I've just installed latest beta drivers so I'll see how they go.
Links to screenies of how these settings look:
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z184/shirike/Gaming/witcher22011-05-1819-45-02-35.png
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z184/shirike/Gaming/witcher22011-05-1819-40-08-04.png
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z184/shirike/Gaming/witcher22011-05-1819-35-46-38.png
http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z184/shirike/Gaming/witcher22011-05-1818-41-41-61.png
Post edited May 18, 2011 by WastedJoker
Gvaz
postin thrills
Gvaz Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From United States
Posted May 18, 2011
I did some testing and this game is fuckin weird in the optimizations.
AMD Phenom II X3 720 @ 3.2GHz
8GB DDR2 @ 400MHz in Dual Channel
XFX ATI RadeonHD4890 1GB
Win 7 64bit
11.5 drivers
Steam
1920x1200
All settings are default unless noted.
Ultra: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2max5pjo.jpg
(Default other than maxing EVERYTHING including ubersampling.)
I get 9-15fps walking around. Not playable.
High: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2highnp7v.jpg
I get 20-30fps walking around in this area. 60fps in menus.
Medium: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2mediumjr9h.jpg
I get 28-35fps walking around in this area. 60fps in menus.
Low: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2lowuqg2.jpg
I get 30-40fps walking around in this area. 260+ fps in menus!
I have to play on medium with some things increased and DOF off but it's playable.
However the difference from low to high is almost negligible. This needs SERIOUS optimization. A difference of 10 fps? Thats pretty poor.
AMD Phenom II X3 720 @ 3.2GHz
8GB DDR2 @ 400MHz in Dual Channel
XFX ATI RadeonHD4890 1GB
Win 7 64bit
11.5 drivers
Steam
1920x1200
All settings are default unless noted.
Ultra: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2max5pjo.jpg
(Default other than maxing EVERYTHING including ubersampling.)
I get 9-15fps walking around. Not playable.
High: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2highnp7v.jpg
I get 20-30fps walking around in this area. 60fps in menus.
Medium: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2mediumjr9h.jpg
I get 28-35fps walking around in this area. 60fps in menus.
Low: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2lowuqg2.jpg
I get 30-40fps walking around in this area. 260+ fps in menus!
I have to play on medium with some things increased and DOF off but it's playable.
However the difference from low to high is almost negligible. This needs SERIOUS optimization. A difference of 10 fps? Thats pretty poor.
Post edited May 18, 2011 by Gvaz
AzzurraIrisLeaMonde
Dark Seed
AzzurraIrisLeaMonde Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Italy
Posted May 18, 2011
Gvaz: I did some testing and this game is fuckin weird in the optimizations.
AMD Phenom II X3 720 @ 3.2GHz
8GB DDR2 @ 400MHz in Dual Channel
XFX ATI RadeonHD4890 1GB
Win 7 64bit
11.5 drivers
Steam
1920x1200
All settings are default unless noted.
Ultra: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2max5pjo.jpg
(Default other than maxing EVERYTHING including ubersampling.)
I get 9-15fps walking around. Not playable.
High: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2highnp7v.jpg
I get 20-30fps walking around in this area. 60fps in menus.
Medium: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2mediumjr9h.jpg
I get 28-35fps walking around in this area. 60fps in menus.
Low: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2lowuqg2.jpg
I get 30-40fps walking around in this area. 260+ fps in menus!
I have to play on medium with some things increased and DOF off but it's playable.
However the difference from low to high is almost negligible. This needs SERIOUS optimization. A difference of 10 fps? Thats pretty poor.
Disable ubersampling and you can max everything and play without problems. AMD Phenom II X3 720 @ 3.2GHz
8GB DDR2 @ 400MHz in Dual Channel
XFX ATI RadeonHD4890 1GB
Win 7 64bit
11.5 drivers
Steam
1920x1200
All settings are default unless noted.
Ultra: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2max5pjo.jpg
(Default other than maxing EVERYTHING including ubersampling.)
I get 9-15fps walking around. Not playable.
High: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2highnp7v.jpg
I get 20-30fps walking around in this area. 60fps in menus.
Medium: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2mediumjr9h.jpg
I get 28-35fps walking around in this area. 60fps in menus.
Low: http://www.abload.de/img/witcher2lowuqg2.jpg
I get 30-40fps walking around in this area. 260+ fps in menus!
I have to play on medium with some things increased and DOF off but it's playable.
However the difference from low to high is almost negligible. This needs SERIOUS optimization. A difference of 10 fps? Thats pretty poor.
Disabling it works?
Post edited May 18, 2011 by bluewave256
Gvaz
postin thrills
Gvaz Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From United States
Posted May 18, 2011
I don't want to play on high because it's too slow. I want 60fps.
Zero9X
New User
Zero9X Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2009
From United Kingdom
AzzurraIrisLeaMonde
Dark Seed
AzzurraIrisLeaMonde Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Italy
Posted May 18, 2011
Thank you very much. : )
morgwin
New User
morgwin Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jan 2009
From United Kingdom
Posted May 18, 2011
I can only really run this with nearly everything disabled only the textures are high, Here are my specs
Graphics Card: Nvidia 9500GT 1GB
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz
Memory: 3072MB RAM
going to be upgrading to a GeForce GTX 460 1GB in a few weeks.
Graphics Card: Nvidia 9500GT 1GB
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz
Memory: 3072MB RAM
going to be upgrading to a GeForce GTX 460 1GB in a few weeks.
Gvaz
postin thrills
Gvaz Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From United States
Posted May 18, 2011
You wont see a huge boost unless you upgrade that CPU as well.
AzzurraIrisLeaMonde
Dark Seed
AzzurraIrisLeaMonde Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2008
From Italy
Posted May 18, 2011
morgwin: I can only really run this with nearly everything disabled only the textures are high, Here are my specs
Graphics Card: Nvidia 9500GT 1GB
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz
Memory: 3072MB RAM
going to be upgrading to a GeForce GTX 460 1GB in a few weeks.
I'll suggest a GTX 560 Ti. The CPU is good. Only if you overclock it at 3+ GHz of course. And 4 GB of RAM at least.Graphics Card: Nvidia 9500GT 1GB
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz
Memory: 3072MB RAM
going to be upgrading to a GeForce GTX 460 1GB in a few weeks.
TakumiVK
New User
TakumiVK Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2008
From United Kingdom
Posted May 18, 2011
I havent had any trouble with optimisation. I could play the game buttery smooth on max (including Ubersampling).
Graphics Card: Nvidia GTX 560ti
Processor: Intel i5 2500K over-clocked to 3.2Ghz
Memory: 8GB RAM
Graphics Card: Nvidia GTX 560ti
Processor: Intel i5 2500K over-clocked to 3.2Ghz
Memory: 8GB RAM
KenR7A
New User
KenR7A Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: May 2011
From United States
Posted May 18, 2011
What is your definition of buttery smooth? You sure Ubersampling is on? That setting is designed for the most top end cards and SLI. I'm talking dual GTX590s here.
pdedinski
New User
pdedinski Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2011
From Bulgaria
Posted May 18, 2011
Phenom II x4 3.2Ghz
6GB RAM
ATI Radeon 5850 1GB
With everything maxed out (Ubersampling included) result is about 13-14 FPS Average
Everything on MAX and Ubersampling Off, result is 30-50FPS, which is completely OK with me at least.
Most of the PC games in the last few years are developed primarily for consoles, which are already behind the PC in terms of processing power, so they run easy with very high graphic settings on mid-high machines. The Witcher 2 however is an exclusive PC title, and we can expect that some more cutting edge graphic techniques are implemented, therefore putting a lot more load on the CPUs/GPUs.
Ubsersampling as far as I know in general is a technique that renders every frame, or a part of it several times and then blends them together for the best result possible. Said with a few words, this is an option for high-end SLI/Crossfire cards, so anyone with a single-GPU card should put it on Disabled.
6GB RAM
ATI Radeon 5850 1GB
With everything maxed out (Ubersampling included) result is about 13-14 FPS Average
Everything on MAX and Ubersampling Off, result is 30-50FPS, which is completely OK with me at least.
Most of the PC games in the last few years are developed primarily for consoles, which are already behind the PC in terms of processing power, so they run easy with very high graphic settings on mid-high machines. The Witcher 2 however is an exclusive PC title, and we can expect that some more cutting edge graphic techniques are implemented, therefore putting a lot more load on the CPUs/GPUs.
Ubsersampling as far as I know in general is a technique that renders every frame, or a part of it several times and then blends them together for the best result possible. Said with a few words, this is an option for high-end SLI/Crossfire cards, so anyone with a single-GPU card should put it on Disabled.
TakumiVK
New User
TakumiVK Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2008
From United Kingdom
Posted May 18, 2011
TakumiVK: I havent had any trouble with optimisation. I could play the game buttery smooth on max (including Ubersampling).
Graphics Card: Nvidia GTX 560ti
Processor: Intel i5 2500K over-clocked to 3.2Ghz
Memory: 8GB RAM
KenR7A: What is your definition of buttery smooth? You sure Ubersampling is on? That setting is designed for the most top end cards and SLI. I'm talking dual GTX590s here. Graphics Card: Nvidia GTX 560ti
Processor: Intel i5 2500K over-clocked to 3.2Ghz
Memory: 8GB RAM