Posted June 07, 2011
low rated
1. "CDPJ betrayed PC gamers .... I got a very good PC, and I expect CDPJ to focus on PCs which is the hardware capable to handle game. Moving to console is a dump down step blah blah "
Sorry, you may love yourself a lot. You may have top of line PC which may be as good as those on the physics lab.
But there are PC gamers who don't have that good PCs. And there are console gamers who deserve "the" good game.
But after all, the developer has the right to aim for bigger audience, bring in more income, and consequently more money for the next sequence.
So YOU ARE NOBODY. WITHOUT YOU, THERE ARE STILL MORE CUSTOMERS TO FILL THE HOLES.
2. "This game is too hard. The developer don't know how to make a game. I have to stop the game and just read the story blah blah"
This game treats you like an adult. So maybe you aren't an adult at all. Find a way to beat the challenge. Or choose "easy mode"
3. "The game is too short. And I don't buy that 16 outcomes. I don't buy that quality over quantity"
One: you didn't finish the game until you play at least 2 playthrough. Second: the 16 outcomes give you 16 people to talk with, 16 sets of voice over, 16 totally different political outcomes which poses real challenges for next sequence to reflect them all.
So maybe you want to go back and play Daggerfall and those classic games 15 years ago. They are long. But they have text dialogue and 2D graphic. Or you can write a $100000 check to the developer to make a longer game for you.
4. "That combat is shit, I want the old strong style, weak style, the combos blah blah blah".
Sorry you are again raped by old games. While the WC1 combat was good, WC2 combat is superior for many many gamers.
And if you want old turn base attack like Neverwinter Night, then go back to play those games.
This is Witcher 2.
5. "This game is too expensive. Yet the game is linear, lack of dialogue choice, lack of blah blah blah"
It takes 4 years hardwork to make games. Cost of gas and food is more than this game.
Maybe if you want too much, you can start to make a game on your own and have a taste of programming.
Sorry, you may love yourself a lot. You may have top of line PC which may be as good as those on the physics lab.
But there are PC gamers who don't have that good PCs. And there are console gamers who deserve "the" good game.
But after all, the developer has the right to aim for bigger audience, bring in more income, and consequently more money for the next sequence.
So YOU ARE NOBODY. WITHOUT YOU, THERE ARE STILL MORE CUSTOMERS TO FILL THE HOLES.
2. "This game is too hard. The developer don't know how to make a game. I have to stop the game and just read the story blah blah"
This game treats you like an adult. So maybe you aren't an adult at all. Find a way to beat the challenge. Or choose "easy mode"
3. "The game is too short. And I don't buy that 16 outcomes. I don't buy that quality over quantity"
One: you didn't finish the game until you play at least 2 playthrough. Second: the 16 outcomes give you 16 people to talk with, 16 sets of voice over, 16 totally different political outcomes which poses real challenges for next sequence to reflect them all.
So maybe you want to go back and play Daggerfall and those classic games 15 years ago. They are long. But they have text dialogue and 2D graphic. Or you can write a $100000 check to the developer to make a longer game for you.
4. "That combat is shit, I want the old strong style, weak style, the combos blah blah blah".
Sorry you are again raped by old games. While the WC1 combat was good, WC2 combat is superior for many many gamers.
And if you want old turn base attack like Neverwinter Night, then go back to play those games.
This is Witcher 2.
5. "This game is too expensive. Yet the game is linear, lack of dialogue choice, lack of blah blah blah"
It takes 4 years hardwork to make games. Cost of gas and food is more than this game.
Maybe if you want too much, you can start to make a game on your own and have a taste of programming.
Post edited June 08, 2011 by Freewind