It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
The Witcher 2Funny review(18 posts)(18 posts)
(18 posts)
Pages:
1
2
This is my favourite topic
Posted June 06, 2011
http://youtu.be/htP7S7jsXyA
Posted June 06, 2011
avatar
trusteft: http://youtu.be/htP7S7jsXyA
Honestly thats a really great review, his points are dead on and he makes it hilarious to watch.
Posted June 06, 2011
avatar
trusteft: http://youtu.be/htP7S7jsXyA
avatar
tyrindor: Honestly thats a really great review, his points are dead on and he makes it hilarious to watch.
Yeah, he is among my favourite reviewers.
Posted June 06, 2011
that was hilarious, and i usually turn of video reviews after about 30 seconds.
Posted June 06, 2011
He was good except for fast travel part
Posted June 06, 2011
A couple more good balanced reviews like that and he'll be off my ****list for his trashing of Alpha Protocol.

The praise and criticism both were spot on and balanced well against each other.
Posted June 06, 2011
I had to stop watching to go get another sock!! Seriously I stopped(only 10 mins) cause I'm still only in Ch_1 and don't want any more Spoilers.

The consequence of this review is the game will now sell for $10 bucks more(supply and demand).. Very nifty review!! Mail this to every Bioware Fanboy you know!!
Posted June 06, 2011
One of the best reviews, if not the absolute best for Witcher 2. It's funny, smart and it absolutely nails both good and bad points about the game.
Posted June 06, 2011
Love it :) Funny and true.
Posted June 06, 2011
SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEX. That just made my day.
Posted June 06, 2011
avatar
jklinders: A couple more good balanced reviews like that and he'll be off my ****list for his trashing of Alpha Protocol.

The praise and criticism both were spot on and balanced well against each other.
In all fairness, he admited that review was just for the 360 version, which had more issues. Don't forget that there is almost no one (reviewer) who liked the game enough to give it higher grade than Angry Joe did. Mind you, I would give the game 8.5/10 (PC) cause I loved the game.
Posted June 06, 2011
avatar
jklinders: A couple more good balanced reviews like that and he'll be off my ****list for his trashing of Alpha Protocol.

The praise and criticism both were spot on and balanced well against each other.
avatar
trusteft: In all fairness, he admited that review was just for the 360 version, which had more issues. Don't forget that there is almost no one (reviewer) who liked the game enough to give it higher grade than Angry Joe did. Mind you, I would give the game 8.5/10 (PC) cause I loved the game.
That still puts him well below average for the 360 and PS3 versions which were low 60s. Not to mention he clearly just hated the shooting mechanics and held that against it a lot. He said the shooting was broken when really it worked as intended. Just not the way he wanted.

I loved that game warts and all but wouldn't give it more than a 7.5/10 myself. It really had a lot of bad issues but had some of the better writing I've seen lately. If the tech issues were cleaned up I'd say 8 maybe 8.5.
Posted June 06, 2011
avatar
trusteft: In all fairness, he admited that review was just for the 360 version, which had more issues. Don't forget that there is almost no one (reviewer) who liked the game enough to give it higher grade than Angry Joe did. Mind you, I would give the game 8.5/10 (PC) cause I loved the game.
avatar
jklinders: That still puts him well below average for the 360 and PS3 versions which were low 60s. Not to mention he clearly just hated the shooting mechanics and held that against it a lot. He said the shooting was broken when really it worked as intended. Just not the way he wanted.

I loved that game warts and all but wouldn't give it more than a 7.5/10 myself. It really had a lot of bad issues but had some of the better writing I've seen lately. If the tech issues were cleaned up I'd say 8 maybe 8.5.
Well, I never had any issue with the game. Not once, technical or otherwise. I only played the game 4 times from start to finish, with different dialogue options and different battle styles etc. Perhaps if I played a fifth one I would have seen something. :p
Posted June 06, 2011
avatar
jklinders: That still puts him well below average for the 360 and PS3 versions which were low 60s. Not to mention he clearly just hated the shooting mechanics and held that against it a lot. He said the shooting was broken when really it worked as intended. Just not the way he wanted.

I loved that game warts and all but wouldn't give it more than a 7.5/10 myself. It really had a lot of bad issues but had some of the better writing I've seen lately. If the tech issues were cleaned up I'd say 8 maybe 8.5.
avatar
trusteft: Well, I never had any issue with the game. Not once, technical or otherwise. I only played the game 4 times from start to finish, with different dialogue options and different battle styles etc. Perhaps if I played a fifth one I would have seen something. :p
Well you and I were among the lucky ones then. Some people had crap with falling through the floor. Others had weird crap happening to their controls.

Just because the worst bug I had was having guards disappear after reloading a save doesn't mean some folks didn't end up with a nigh unplayable mess. Such things need to be taken into account.

Otherwise I loved the game and just about anything Obsidian does.
Posted June 06, 2011
avatar
BiggusD1: He was good except for fast travel part
i agree... you had the old man in chapter 1 and the hut on the hill in chapter 2 to go back and forth a couple times but those were probably less than 60 second slogs one way.

i almost had to pause it at the door slamming part.
Pages:
1
2
This is my favourite topic
Community
The Witcher 2Funny review(18 posts)(18 posts)
(18 posts)