I'm not arguing against your point either :). You made some good points about releasing the game earlier - although some customers would take offense at feeling like a beta tester.

Yes, I've considered the possibility of them being oblivious to some problems because they know the game so damn well and they've been working so long on it they simply missed those issues. They're probably understaffed, because as a rule (well I never worked in the industry, but based on what I learned in my programming classes) it's best to let someone who is completely unfamiliar with a piece of software to run it / do blackbox testing.

He flamed me couple of times and openly laughing about it simply for disagreeing with what my opinion is. I learn to ignore an immature child in the forums overtime.

I agree, altough it is very hard to ignore when half of the forums is spammed with his nonsense. ;)

Sorry, didn't see your post above 227's.

I am supposed to work on your behalf to find support for your statement? If I said something like "The Flying Spaghetti Monster exists", is it on me to prove my statement, or does it depend on you to prove that FSM doesn't exist (and failing so proves me correct)?

Admittedly not a good example (according to 227), my point is that if the developers have tested it on different hardware they would have seen some of the issues that people complained about.

I don't get what you don't get either. I didn't say my speculations are facts. Your posts are not only rife with strawman, but you also refuse to back up your arguments like "a sane poster" would do in a similar circumstances. No, contrary to your expectation, claiming that "I don't get you", "you type like that", "you are full of contradiction" does nothing to undermine my points nor do they support your claim as a "sane poster". And my, you really like to use the same words again and again as a catch-all.