It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Grombolar: Minilaptops/notebooks/netbooks with integrated video cards, not all of us want the high-end puters which can do cooking & babysitting for oneself. No offense.
DirectX 9 is over 10 years old now. Nobody makes an integrated graphics solution anymore that doesn't support it. Besides, those required specs are not "high-end" in the slightest. Like I said, they were high end maybe 10 years ago, but I've got a cell phone today that could almost run this. If your machine has less power than my cell phone, then I stand by my statement, you are way past time for an upgrade.
NewDark will work any any piece of junk that can run xp, and has a graphics card that can accelerate DX6, but some functionality may not be available.
Thank you cogadh & voodoo47 for explaining it a bit further.

I'd just like to know if the game would run on crap-low-end-silly-notebooks manufactured in the 2010's, that's all... :)

But the main point is after reading the system requirements is that I'd like to know if a game works BEFORE trying/buying it, as there seems to be no demo about .:P

Sorry for the silly strop.
the demo is here: http://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=140085
DEFINITELY try the demo as it works. There are a number of options you can force off even view distance which I don't think was possible earlier so it's possible you could make the game run better than it originally was intended, with the original graphics capability or slightly better. I suggest the torrent as the demo in that one already includes the NewDark mod/update so all you have to do is download and extract the the file then try it. You have to change manually to run in DX6 mode in the cam_ext.cfg file but I think DX9 has better optimization so might as well try with that first.
avatar
Grombolar: Thank you cogadh & voodoo47 for explaining it a bit further.

I'd just like to know if the game would run on crap-low-end-silly-notebooks manufactured in the 2010's, that's all... :)

But the main point is after reading the system requirements is that I'd like to know if a game works BEFORE trying/buying it, as there seems to be no demo about .:P

Sorry for the silly strop.
I can't believe none of us have asked this yet, but what exactly are your machine's hardware specs?
My understanding is, all the Dark Engine games require higher system reqs than their contemporaries, because of the difficulties in getting them to run on modern systems. GOG didn't just stick it on DOSBOX, because DOSBOX doesn't work very well for them.
avatar
metaphysician: My understanding is, all the Dark Engine games require higher system reqs than their contemporaries, because of the difficulties in getting them to run on modern systems. GOG didn't just stick it on DOSBOX, because DOSBOX doesn't work very well for them.
DOSBox doesn't work at all for this, it's not a DOS game.
it's not Dark, it's NewDark.
Attachments:
newdark.jpg (363 Kb)
Post edited February 14, 2013 by voodoo47
avatar
Grombolar: That's what DosBOX was created, but this GOG version goes too far on MODERN computers in my opinion.
You think a Pentium 3 level CPU is "going too far" on modern? :p Pentium 3s were launched in 1999, the same year this game is from. I don't really see how you can complain about those specs when what voodoo47 posts is a 10 year old system. A netbook is a silly thing to expect to play atual games, even old ones. They're not designed with that in mind, at all. Any game that runs on it in any playable manner you should consider a stroke of luck, not a matter of course..

But post the exact specifications of your netbook... it might be one with a ION chipset and that'll make it at least somewhat capable. If it's with an old integrated Intel GPU... chances are getting low.
Post edited February 14, 2013 by poulwrist
avatar
Grombolar: Old schoolers with poopy notebooks dare to differ, some of us want simplicity without any new features/graphical changes & such... Everything is updated, improved & so forth, it's not even funny when they only work on super-duper-über-winz0r -computers, making everything "BETTER".

Sadly yet another pass for me. Thought it was the whole point of GOG making games work as simply as easily in the first place? STEAMy. :(
avatar
cogadh: And that's exactly what NewDark does, it makes things simply work. Without it, the game is almost impossible to run on any modern OS or hardware, even low spec hardware. It doesn't actually change anything about the game's content, it's still the same System Shock 2 that came out in 1999, complete with 1999-era graphics. It does increase the abilities of the game's engine, such as allowing to run it at higher screen resolutions and allowing modders to add higher polycount models, but it is otherwise the same exact game. Besides, those minimum specs are less than what a computer would have had 8-10 years ago. If your machine is lower than that, the problem is not GOG, the problem is you need to upgrade badly. Frankly I find it hard to believe that you are still running a machine with a less than 1.8GHz processor, 2GB of RAM and a DirectX 9 compatible video card/chipset.
I'd agree about ancient hardware and the need for an upgrade, but you're not quite right about the PCs from 8-10 years ago. 1GB of RAM was about the minimum in 2005 I do recall, but maybe that was just my potato desktop compared to the majority. Considering 2GB minimums were only stressed by the time of Windows Vista, you're looking at something that was arguably along the better equipped end of budget/mainstream computing.

I'm also curious if this will run on a N450 Atom netbook. All signs point to no. Not surprising, since Deus Ex runs a little sluggish on this thing. It's still a valid concern for people with netbooks (We're talking roughly 1.6Ghz clocked Atoms, 1GB of DDR2, Win XP/7 Starter. These things are much less capable at gaming than you'd hope for. They run Infinity Engine games, old school adventure games and the sort, but that's about it sadly. Something like idTech 3, Unreal 1, or 720p YouTube is stretching it--HD playback actually makes this thing come to a halt).

And the expectation that SysShock 2 should simply run on ancient hardware is not unfounded. But you are right, there are other variables, chiefly New Dark. Not a proper analogy at all, but I see it as almost emulating the original game, or updating the API to run DX9 (long may it live) instead of antiquated DX6; that should account for increases in hardware requirements. Still, as someone else pointed out here, 512MB GPU seems a bit...excessive.
Post edited February 14, 2013 by recognizer
yes, it will run on an atom netbook. as long as you won't try to run it in fullHD resolution on an external screen, you will be fine.

forget about anti aliasing or hires mods (like the four hundred) though.
Post edited February 14, 2013 by voodoo47
avatar
voodoo47: yes, it will run on an atom netbook. as long as you won't try to run it in fullHD resolution on an external screen, you will be fine.

forget about anti aliasing or hires mods (like the four hundred) though.
Yeah, on paper it should run (well, 2GB RAM vs 1GB; 2Ghz clock vs 1.6Ghz is cutting it a bit close), but then I heard the same about people who ran Deus Ex "flawlessly" on their netbooks while I had to suffer through a somewhat frame-skippy (but no less enjoyable!) playthrough.

Wiping the machine from W7 Starter to XP did little to improve the performance, mind, so it wasn't the OS, more likely the Intel GMA 3150. These netbooks circa 2007-2010 are simply rubbish for gaming in any kind of 3D it seems.
why don't you just fire up the free demo and see how well it runs: http://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=140085
avatar
voodoo47: why don't you just fire up the free demo and see how well it runs: http://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=140085
Schanks! But between my desktop rig and a laptop I got for Christmas, I'm set for platforms to play things on. I only ask because I've got this peevish need to see what I can run on the lowest denominator; in this case, it's the baby netbook. I plan on buying SS2 anyway as soon as my backlog/free time clears up.

Oh and a shameless plug for AMD; for a cheap PC gaming solution, their Trinity APUs (A8-4500M here) are mighty impressive, putting up a great fight against their Ivy Bridge+HD4000 competitors. XCOM: EU on the highest settings? Civ 5 on mostly high settings? RAGE at near 60fps? Not a problem. Anyone that doesn't mind a little heft in their laptops and who don't want to break the bank should look into getting one of these, especially if you're on outdated hardware!