Caesar.: I am having a blast with Stronghold and your description sounds like something I would rally enjoy.
Which of the Anno games would be best for as an entry point in the series? I don't mind old graphics but I prefer polished gameplay/interface.
Does the setting change between games? Do you get to play different factions?
Xu: I echo these questions!
Thanks for sharing.
Gladly :) Oh I'm almost a little afraid to say. I'm leaning towards 1503, but it's a bit more complex than either 1602 or 1701. If you don't mind the graphics then 1602 is a somewhat safer starting point to learn the core mechanics (basically: upgrade settlers into citizens asap). The anno 1602 demo is still floating around so that might be worth checking out. If you like the gameplay and 'get it' then I'd jump into 1503.
By the way 1440 is considered the best in the series, but the old 2D games have a certain inescapable charm :)
The setting doesn't really change between games no. It's always a bunch of islands in a non-descript part of world. All that changes is when it supposedly takes place: 1602, 1503 etc. which affects the kind of technology available - mostly ito military units.
The islands do have different climates however, which affects what kind of crops can be planted. E.g. you can only cultivate tobacco and grapes on the northern islands, whereas you need to go to the more tropical southern islands for things like spices and sugercane.
And the only difference between the factions are their banner colours. So it's also non-descript european nations.
In the campaign there are different factions, good and bad, but I only have limited gametime with the campaign since I usually just play a long sandbox game. The part of the campaign I played was a lot of fun though, so it's definitely worth checking out at least.