murasame: Here it is !
i think your being very unfair. in the first place, they really put a lot of work into offering linux versions of games,
They really did a fantastic job. Games are installed in 2 clicks, work great and there is no differences between the past/linux products apart from what the developpers decide to do.
Basically, if a dev chooses not to update the Linux version of their game for whatever reason, i can't see how gog should be held for responsible.
That said, Stardew valley is out. ! :-))))
throgh: To be honest: My comment is a reference to the general behavior of GOG related to games that have in fact official Linux-versions and which are not available here since long time. For example like
Metro or
Dungeons 2 (more examples also easy to be found). Where are those versions? Nobody knows, but of course the past is here. So Linux-users are treated as second class at all and this is also the case by having an official released version more than five days later. ;-)
Could be meny reasons for this, And its not up to gog to add linux ports.
The one you want to blame is the devs.
And Im sure they will only tell you, linux is small, and there is no point for them to put it on GoG.
It cost more then its worth the effort.
And lets say GoG even asked for Linux port, its still up to the devs to give it to them.
And from my experience, gog always seems to apply very solid ports.
Metro LL and Metro wasnt really very solid ports. Iv remember having alot of problems under Linux.
It ran good, but still hade alooot of problems. And I can see why gog rejected them from selling it on GoG,
if thats the case.
Also Dying Light runs like a potato under Linux, this could also be the reason why we dont see it on Gog,
or the devs behinde Dying Light dont want to bother with it.
Saying its GoG's fault, is very unfair, cause we dont really know whos to blame.
But I dont want GoG to be another Steam, toons of broken games and there is jsut a pure mess in the store.