It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I'm thinking of making this party:
Spellblade Fighter (tank, damage, minor arcane spells)
Paladin (face, damage, divine spells)
Ranger ( traps, stealth, divine spells, ranged combat)
Druid ( healer, nuker)

Would this be feasable? Is a Cleric healer recommended over the Druid? Is a Wizard necessary? I would give the Ranger "rogue" skills.

Thanks in advanc!
No posts in this topic were marked as the solution yet. If you can help, add your reply
avatar
GawainBS: I'm thinking of making this party:
Spellblade Fighter (tank, damage, minor arcane spells)
Paladin (face, damage, divine spells)
Ranger ( traps, stealth, divine spells, ranged combat)
Druid ( healer, nuker)

Would this be feasable? Is a Cleric healer recommended over the Druid? Is a Wizard necessary? I would give the Ranger "rogue" skills.

Thanks in advanc!
I have seen players run the full campaign with 4 Rogues, or 4 Rangers so...

no, a Wizard or Cleric are not "required". They might make things easier with than w/o, but the game does not require any given class.