It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
It’s a boardgame at heart, right? Surely, if you strip out the baffling interface and superfluous 3D engine, you’ll be left with a hardcore strategy game that’ll eat up the hours. Surely?
Well, yes and no. Yes, because the setting is novel and it’s always fun to play a game that taxes the grey matter. But mainly no. No, because the game mechanics are simple and repetitive. No, because it’s a game that disguises itself as something much more complicated than it actually is. No because, in the end, it’s a bit dull.
I really wanted to like this game, but I got bored before I finished it. So it gets three stars for being out there as a concept, but it’d take the most beardy of strategists to extract any lasting fun from this ambitious but fatally flawed game.
Doesn't sounds like a 3 out of 5 at all then.
Very misleading review.
Post edited August 05, 2009 by xlucidx
I like it.
Instead of carrying on the flag on of gloom. How about let people decide for themselves?
Alot of people have never heard of this game. Now is the chance that it never got. Please don't demolish it.
avatar
dreadcog: I like it.
Instead of carrying on the flag on of gloom. How about let people decide for themselves?
Alot of people have never heard of this game. Now is the chance that it never got. Please don't demolish it.

Agreed, this game is quite a lot of fun especially after you get over the slightly clunky interface. I enjoy the nuances and the political bartering you get to do.
i like it, it reminds me shadow president or even a pc game named solidarnosc .
I am becoming confident with the engine and (tried on hard) i am impressed by the AI