It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
might be a silly question, but how do i accuse the immigrants of lying if their purpose of arrival is different then the one written on the entry permit?
for example they say they are just passing through but the paper states that they are visiting a friend.
This question / problem has been solved by Lord_Kaneimage
avatar
gonebonkers9000: might be a silly question, but how do i accuse the immigrants of lying if their purpose of arrival is different then the one written on the entry permit?
for example they say they are just passing through but the paper states that they are visiting a friend.
1. Bring out the transcript (its behind the interrogate speaker)
2. Activate inspection mode.
3. Highlight the incorrect response with the entry permits stated purpose of visit.
4. Interrogate.
5. ????
6. Approve, Deny or Detain (if possible.)

Or you can just deny them and they walk of, cant always do it though.
Post edited August 13, 2013 by Lord_Kane
avatar
Lord_Kane: 6. Approve, Deny or Detain (if possible.)
In my experience the usual response is "I'm sorry, I make mistake. I'm just passing through" (if their permit says Transit and they said they've come to work, etc.)

Which is kinda funny, because if there are no other discrepancies, you can give them the green stamp. If this was real life, and the client changes their story just like that, it would seem suspicious enough to valid an insta-detain. Even more so, if their permit says they're staying a week, but the client says they're staying for a full year. Then they apologize when you question them, correct themselves, and pass through...how much would you bet they aren't gonna come back to their homeland after a week has passed?
avatar
Lord_Kane: 6. Approve, Deny or Detain (if possible.)
avatar
DProject: In my experience the usual response is "I'm sorry, I make mistake. I'm just passing through" (if their permit says Transit and they said they've come to work, etc.)

Which is kinda funny, because if there are no other discrepancies, you can give them the green stamp. If this was real life, and the client changes their story just like that, it would seem suspicious enough to valid an insta-detain. Even more so, if their permit says they're staying a week, but the client says they're staying for a full year. Then they apologize when you question them, correct themselves, and pass through...how much would you bet they aren't gonna come back to their homeland after a week has passed?
I had one who said "I'm staying forever" and then changed it to a week! ;)

Well maybe not "insta-detain" as such (depends on the country I guess), but yes definitely grilled with multiple follow-up questions - who exactly you're visiting, where are you staying, are they related or friends, etc. If they stumbled on the follow-up questions, then it could get more interesting... At the very least they'd have their luggage closely inspected, looking for evidence of a longer stay, or other dodgy things (e.g. undeclared large wad of cash).

To be honest the first few times I had this happen to me, I checked them VERY carefully, thinking that there MUST be something wrong somewhere. Would have liked more follow-up questions, but still a great game.

Would also have liked more people to offer me bribes (hey I need to pay for rent every day!). Most of them still try to deny they have contraband even after the strip search: "You can see that?". Kind of funny though. Gotta love Jorge though: "Is drugs!". He gets points for honesty. :)
avatar
squid830: I had one who said "I'm staying forever" and then changed it to a week! ;)

Well maybe not "insta-detain" as such (depends on the country I guess), but yes definitely grilled with multiple follow-up questions - who exactly you're visiting, where are you staying, are they related or friends, etc. If they stumbled on the follow-up questions, then it could get more interesting... At the very least they'd have their luggage closely inspected, looking for evidence of a longer stay, or other dodgy things (e.g. undeclared large wad of cash).
That's actually a great idea. I hope a sequel or a major patch / DLC adds this gameplay element.
avatar
squid830: To be honest the first few times I had this happen to me, I checked them VERY carefully, thinking that there MUST be something wrong somewhere. Would have liked more follow-up questions, but still a great game.
Hehe, yes I did that too. If a person comes off suspicious the moment he walks in, there must be something wrong with their documents: why else would they be so nervous as to mix "a week" and "forever" like that... But often the other information checked out just fine. Maybe it was because they were so afraid that if they'd get a red stamp, something terrible would surely happen to them in their own country.
avatar
squid830: I had one who said "I'm staying forever" and then changed it to a week! ;)

Well maybe not "insta-detain" as such (depends on the country I guess), but yes definitely grilled with multiple follow-up questions - who exactly you're visiting, where are you staying, are they related or friends, etc. If they stumbled on the follow-up questions, then it could get more interesting... At the very least they'd have their luggage closely inspected, looking for evidence of a longer stay, or other dodgy things (e.g. undeclared large wad of cash).
avatar
DProject: That's actually a great idea. I hope a sequel or a major patch / DLC adds this gameplay element.
I was actually saying that was how it seems to work in the real world - at least on "Border Security" (one of those COPS-style shows where they film dodgy people trying one over on Australia's customs people); however I wouldn't mind having that in a DLC - this game is really good, but it's a bit short on content - it's begging for a DLC or at least mods.

Although for the setting, they could come in their cars in addition to coming on foot. Then they could have car-bombs, car searches (for bombs, massive drug caches), possibly impounding the cars for further analysis by some off-screen team...
avatar
squid830: To be honest the first few times I had this happen to me, I checked them VERY carefully, thinking that there MUST be something wrong somewhere. Would have liked more follow-up questions, but still a great game.
avatar
DProject: Hehe, yes I did that too. If a person comes off suspicious the moment he walks in, there must be something wrong with their documents: why else would they be so nervous as to mix "a week" and "forever" like that... But often the other information checked out just fine. Maybe it was because they were so afraid that if they'd get a red stamp, something terrible would surely happen to them in their own country.
Yeah possibly. Also Arstotzka's border security does look a little bit threatening as well, so would understand mixups between a few months and a few weeks, or forgetting they're here for work. Saying they're here for work when they're not though - that definitely set off red flags!