"The community" consists of people going to the store page with the sole intention of review bombing and marking review bomb reviews as "helpful". How many people to you think actively goes to random store pages and looks through a bunch of reviews, reads through them all and marks them as helpful (because why would a bunch of people just head onto a store page and mark a bunch of reviews as helpful without reading them?). These people are united by their review bomb crusade. It's not a natural process at all.

This is why I think that review bomb reviews should be flagged as being automatically unhelpful. MAYBE allow one for visibility. MAYBE. But it'd be much better to have an actual review that mentions it as well and not just some shitpost "review" with a 1/5 score.

You're not helping your fellow gog users by review bombing.

Maybe I should have said cultural Marxism.
If a publisher is willing to throw away a successful product and send the artists for the reprogramming of their broken brain, to avoid the backlash of having possibly hurt some members of a protected class, it shows you where they think they stand socially. "Assumed" White cishet toxic gamer better learn his place or be brought down.

This type of bullshit again.

/faceplam

You know... lashing out like this cause you dont like that people agree with the sentiment (which in essence is WHY THEY ARE BEING MARKED AS HELPFUL) isnt going to help your fellow users either. What is is to make them aware of issues you have with said game.

That said if you want to ignore all that, Im sure you can find people streaming the game and see it for yourself to make up your mind. That might help YOU and those who dont care about this issue far more.

EDIT: actually I reccomend it over reading blurbs in a gamestore anyway to be quite honest. I use these blurbs myself SEPCIFICALLY to be alerted to bullets to dodge. If I want to know how good a game is, I would rather check it out myself... and reccomend anyone else do the same

If I were one of the developers of Ion Fury, instead of changing my game to suit the fake rage, I would have trolled them a little bit by adding in "Butt Kickem" as a secondary character to pick from at start. Basically a Duke Nukem ripoff, complete with similar dooshy one-liners and misogyny. And if they kept crying I'd throw in a Lo Wang type character to boot. And if they still cry I'll add Leisure Suit Larry. lol

I'm sure Google has your best interest at heart. Maybe Snopes could help you as well, and CNN is still going strong. Go, sailor!

"Conspiracy Theorists"
I've seen the mainstream media using that term to smear anyone and everyone who proves them wrong or even slightly disagrees with their narrative. Even if you bring proof of what you say, they call you that. And also notice how last month YouTube said they would "crack down on conspiracy theorists". I can smell the collusion a mile away, but they'll have you believe "It's a conspiracy theory to claim that we're calling people conspiracy theorists". lol

I know that was off topic but I had to say it.

Dude, stop. Just stop. You sound like Alex Jones, and only discredit your cause.

They're not wrong though and I don't see you proving otherwise.

If people feel it's the way to get their opinion on what these idiots did. I support it. It doesn't mean it's a bad game and I doubt anyone actually cares about those reviews. But people have the right to state their opinion on the situation.

LMFAO... Wow just wow... You just validated my point.

You have a better definition?

AltaVista tells me that you're not worth the time, but you could always prove me wrong.

Is that codeword for dodging the question?

What does Google tell you about that?