Posted May 09, 2020
artphotodude2019: I love GOG, but 2.0 is arguably a lot less functional than just using the web-interface.
slayer1027: How so? The only main difference between GoG 1 and 2 is UI, barring a few missing tabs for the community forums, etc. Functionally I personally prefer the layout of 2.0 and how customizable the entire application is. The issue comes down to whether or not you're willing to put in the 10 minutes it takes to learn how it all works. Core function (buying, storing and downloading games) broken: I can no longer download and install my games, and when I try, it results in a breakdown of my computer (well, the OS at least, not hardware, of course).
So not only does it no longer do what it´s supposed to to do, it also adds damage.
Bonus features damaged: The forum is now hidden - this was the only feature I used and enjoyed.
The looks - looks are largely irrelevant to me, but I had no objections to the appearance of 1.2. And I will never accept to even consideri the looks before the thing is fully functional.
whystler2012: Interestingly, as much as it is lacking core GoG functionality compared to the previous launcher, it's Steam integration is quite good. It shows me significantly more information available through the Steam API that the Steam client itself for some reason is incapable of providing, like which of my games would run in Linux/SteamOS without having to actually start the Steam client on Linux itself. It also shows, for some games at least, what level/subgame/zone within a game people on my contact list are at, whereas the Steam client just shows the game they are playing.
To be fair, I also found this also to be surprisingly well implememented, and I failed to really appraciate it in the smoke of my fury over the rest :-)Post edited May 09, 2020 by fi92