djoxyk: terrible idea. it is faster to learn from scratch how to install and configure your own wine prefixes than spending hours in attempt to use bloated buggy Lutris just to run wine from it.
I won't tolerate this bloatware in my system, especially after I tested it and saw what kind of buggy mess it is
I know this is over 2 yers ago but it's hard not to comment, nonethelss:
The suggesttion was not to *force you* to install Lutris, it was about *allowing others* to use it.
I for once have spent many an hour trying to work out how to even configure Wine myself, and I will not get those hours back.
Then my main computer broke, I moved to another one, gave Lutris a shot, and had multiple games running in no more time than it took ti download and install them, with no more input required from me than my GOG login and which game I wanted to install.
I call that a very clear win for Lutris.
I'm sure that if I spent a week figuring out the intricacies of WINE, I could configure things myself, but Lutris does that for me, handles the multiple prefixes, per-game settings and compatible WINE versions, which I would otherwise have to experiment with (although I still can, and do tweak WINE settings for some games)
Maybe Lutris has just become better in the last two years, or maybe it works better on specific games, or specific systems/hardware configurations -- and I'm thoroughly skeptic about the Lutris user account and web-based "features" -- but that does not change the fact that it has been a great help for me to move almost all of my gaming from Windows to Linux, with a pretty small investment of time. It's not working all the time, but I think with a little support from GOG, it could get there fast. After all GOG started out by packaging DOSbox with old MS-DOS games in a way which "just worked" without having to set it up yourself -- but without preventing people from doing so, of course. I find it very hard to understand what should be wrong with that.