It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I happen to have read an article about it today.
Youtube sends copyright infringements warnings and gives advertisement revenues to a 3rd party.
Activision, Ubisoft, Deep Silver and other publishers deny they're behind this. EA does send copyright infringements warnings.
It's suggested that those warnings might be send based upon the music you can hear in the videos.

Article (in Dutch): http://tweakers.net/nieuws/93144/youtube-bestookt-gamekanalen-met-copyrightwaarschuwingen.html
avatar
Elmofongo: Oh Dungeon Keeper 3, you know I still have not purchased a Bullfrog game (only Populous 1, but never got around to playing it)
Dungeon Keeper 2 had a trailer for DK 3 on the extras menu, at least on the retail version (haven't tried the GOG version for that, yet). I expected it for years before finally realizing it was never going to come.
avatar
HertogJan: I happen to have read an article about it today.
Youtube sends copyright infringements warnings and gives advertisement revenues to a 3rd party.
Activision, Ubisoft, Deep Silver and other publishers deny they're behind this. EA does send copyright infringements warnings.
It's suggested that those warnings might be send based upon the music you can hear in the videos.
EA and Blizzard are the known ones. Trailers, music, some gameplay videos are basically some of the things that are forbidden.
avatar
HertogJan: Youtube sends copyright infringements warnings and gives advertisement revenues to a 3rd party.
Yes, that's about the gist of it. If it's true, and that is just the new policy, then every major YouTube reviewer/Let'sPlayer will have to leave YouTube and find somewhere else.
I was under the impression that reviews (like Angry Joe's) and let's plays go under the fair use law thingamaton. Has it changed?
avatar
KneeTheCap: I was under the impression that reviews (like Angry Joe's) and let's plays go under the fair use law thingamaton. Has it changed?
It's not about copyright law per se. If you're a youtuber, Google owns your ass. At any time, they can close your account. At any time, they can stop paying you ad revenue. They choose to do it when their system flags your video. You don't have to be DMCAed or found guilty of infringement or whatever.
Post edited December 12, 2013 by Starmaker
avatar
KneeTheCap: I was under the impression that reviews (like Angry Joe's) and let's plays go under the fair use law thingamaton. Has it changed?
avatar
Starmaker: It's not about copyright law per se. If you're a youtuber, Google owns your ass. At any time, they can close your account. At any time, they can stop paying you ad revenue. They choose to do it when their system flags your video. You don't have to be DMCAed or found guilty of infringement or whatever.
Huh. Well that's convenient.
avatar
HertogJan: I happen to have read an article about it today.
Youtube sends copyright infringements warnings and gives advertisement revenues to a 3rd party.
Activision, Ubisoft, Deep Silver and other publishers deny they're behind this. EA does send copyright infringements warnings.
It's suggested that those warnings might be send based upon the music you can hear in the videos.

Article (in Dutch): http://tweakers.net/nieuws/93144/youtube-bestookt-gamekanalen-met-copyrightwaarschuwingen.html
I happened to stumble over this video today about the issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctoniQ7Y-C4
Free ride is over :P
avatar
cw8: Angry Joe is already part of NC's site of Channel Awesome.
TB isn't affected by the content ID shit, as far as I know.

There are many other Youtubers getting their videos claimed here and there.
I really doubt it's not hitting TB. He's been hit by Content ID nonsense before, and he's with Polaris, one of the ones AngryJoe mentioned can't really do anything anymore these days.
I feel that Youtube has disturbed the giant hornet nest.
I really recommend you watch Ohmwrecker's videos on this. Although his last one was a wee bit angry, he basically goes over what's going on as he sees it.

The basic gist is this: Youtube has an automated system to protect copyrights. Doesn't really care who you are or what you're doing. People formed Multi Channel Networks, which work with Youtube to get past copyrights and ease monetization. They were supposed to only let in groups/people they could vouch for.

MCN at some point realized they didn't have to do that, and set out recruiting. Some of these networks, through multiple groups have tens of thousands of members. There's no way to police all of them. Even "smaller" sized groups like Polaris have so many people they can't keep track of them all. There was little to no oversight on what was being done and by who.

So Youtube flipped a Killswitch of sorts which buffed the automated system and sent it racing through gaming videos past and present. On top of that, they sent out word to the MCN that they now have to have two types of group members: Managed and Affiliates. With Members they have to actually police and observe what they're doing or face penalties. Affiliates don't have to be, but they don't get the benefits of the group's Youtube polices. So no copyright assistance or anything.

The MCN's responded by generally only giving maybe 5% of their entire group base Managed status. We're talking Total Biscuit, Jesse Cox, people like that. The rest were automatically made into affiliates, which give them no perks. Even people like Pewdiepie (ie the most subscribed thing on Youtube) and Angry Joe are affiliates. Additionally, people are claiming they are refusing to release Youtubers from their MCN contracts, despite the fundamental shift in how things work. And are still insisting on their percentage of the money the youtuber makes on the videos that aren't flagged, which in some cases can be as much as 50/50. For the most part, you can't verify that with the Networks; they haven't really said anything. Most information is coming from youtubers themselves.

Youtube is also instituting a monetization review process in January. They claim it'll be on an "honor system" where the more you get okayed for videos, the faster it goes. But it's a whole nother can of worms. And again, Affiliates in MCN get no assistance with that.

No side is correct in this. Youtube are actively acting beholden to IP holders and beating their content providers (again, who draw in the most people on Youtube period) like battered spouses, but MCN's were complete slimey douches and kind of forced this on themselves; and now aren't taking responsibility.

And you're left with some of the biggest people on Youtube, and some of the more powerful voices free in the industry hurting, while also showing some of the darksides of others with how they're reacting to the situation.
Post edited December 12, 2013 by Hawk52
I'm necroing, but how is this even legal? I don't understand it, but the way I see it is it's basically a guilty unless proven innocent ordeal, which should hold up in almost no modern developed country.
It seems if you appeal it, it's up to the claimant to say whether or not you're in the wrong?
I'm just having a hard time believing this is legal unless there's a loophole being exploited.
avatar
Nroug7: I'm necroing, but how is this even legal? I don't understand it, but the way I see it is it's basically a guilty unless proven innocent ordeal, which should hold up in almost no modern developed country.
It seems if you appeal it, it's up to the claimant to say whether or not you're in the wrong?
I'm just having a hard time believing this is legal unless there's a loophole being exploited.
Pretty much. In the real world, the burden of proof is on the Plaintiff, not the Defendant.
What I also find funny about this is it's a tiered system. Managed Partners get off scott-free whilst Affiliates have to deal with this crap. It pains me to see Joe is an affiliate. Also, people can set up fake companies, applying for copyright for certain parts of a game (End Credits are popular here) in order to fleece the money off of more popular YouTubers.
I also found this good listening about Content ID
Post edited December 26, 2013 by FantasyNightmare