It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)You know how you should never tempt fate?(161 posts)(161 posts)
(161 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
This is my favourite topic
Posted October 05, 2009
low rated
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: I'd listen to bansama if I were you, because from what I've observed, bansama is quite a bit more intelligent than you.

I can state quite unecquivocably that that very assumption would be a *very* dangerous mistake. I have rarely met anyone that can hold court with me on *any* relevant issue which requires philosophical, logical, or analytical ability to debate. Though I despise the false prophet of humility, I am not bragging here, I am expositing. As I said to Banana, it's a grave error to draw a conclusion or trust an impression when the quantity (and quality) of information you possess is scant.
Posted October 05, 2009
So basically, you're talking out of your anus.
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
anjohl: I can state quite unecquivocably that that very assumption would be a *very* dangerous mistake. I have rarely met anyone that can hold court with me on *any* relevant issue which requires philosophical, logical, or analytical ability to debate. Though I despise the false prophet of humility, I am not bragging here, I am expositing. As I said to Banana, it's a grave error to draw a conclusion or trust an impression when the quantity (and quality) of information you possess is scant.

Yes, I agree, you're so well informed that you even know how to spell the names of people that you're putting down correctly!
It's bansama, not banana, unless there's someone named Banana on the forum that I haven't seen yet.
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
anjohl: I can state quite unecquivocably that that very assumption would be a *very* dangerous mistake. I have rarely met anyone that can hold court with me on *any* relevant issue which requires philosophical, logical, or analytical ability to debate. Though I despise the false prophet of humility, I am not bragging here, I am expositing. As I said to Banana, it's a grave error to draw a conclusion or trust an impression when the quantity (and quality) of information you possess is scant.

In other words, you hold the opinion that rarely will anyone hold court with you on *any* relevant issue which requires philosophical, logical, or analytical ability to debate. That's an opinion that any logical person would have kept to themselves as a formality of proper debate. Clearly you need more experience in order to learn how to conduct yourself in a respectable manner.
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: I'd listen to bansama if I were you, because from what I've observed, bansama is quite a bit more intelligent than you.
avatar
anjohl: I can state quite unecquivocably that that very assumption would be a *very* dangerous mistake. I have rarely met anyone that can hold court with me on *any* relevant issue which requires philosophical, logical, or analytical ability to debate. Though I despise the false prophet of humility, I am not bragging here, I am expositing. As I said to Banana, it's a grave error to draw a conclusion or trust an impression when the quantity (and quality) of information you possess is scant.

Ugh. I'm sorry, but you really sound full of yourself
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: I'd listen to bansama if I were you, because from what I've observed, bansama is quite a bit more intelligent than you.
avatar
anjohl: I can state quite unecquivocably that that very assumption would be a *very* dangerous mistake. I have rarely met anyone that can hold court with me on *any* relevant issue which requires philosophical, logical, or analytical ability to debate. Though I despise the false prophet of humility, I am not bragging here, I am expositing. As I said to Banana, it's a grave error to draw a conclusion or trust an impression when the quantity (and quality) of information you possess is scant.

Wow...just wow.
Exactly how deeply is your head jammed in to your own ass?
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
anjohl: I can state quite unecquivocably that that very assumption would be a *very* dangerous mistake. I have rarely met anyone that can hold court with me on *any* relevant issue which requires philosophical, logical, or analytical ability to debate. Though I despise the false prophet of humility, I am not bragging here, I am expositing. As I said to Banana, it's a grave error to draw a conclusion or trust an impression when the quantity (and quality) of information you possess is scant.
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: Yes, I agree, you're so well informed that you even know how to spell the names of people that you're putting down correctly!
It's bansama, not banana, unless there's someone named Banana on the forum that I haven't seen yet.

I thought it was a subtle way of calling him a dick, but it is possible I over analyzed the comment.
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
anjohl: 1) I have no interest in threats. I have no interest in status or impressions either. So, your first point shows that you not only have idea about the circumstances of the lawsuit, but of the person you are talking to either.
2) When you show me your legal credentials, you can make those kinds of statements. Until then, you don't *have* an opinion.
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: Oh anjohl, you ARE quite the character.
I'd listen to bansama if I were you, because from what I've observed, bansama is quite a bit more intelligent than you.

You have a think against anjohl, don't you?
It's OK, I started thinking he was talking shit after threatning to sue Valve/Steam for no reason other than they were dicks.
avatar
PoSSeSSeDCoW: I'd listen to bansama if I were you, because from what I've observed, bansama is quite a bit more intelligent than you.
avatar
anjohl: I have rarely met anyone that can hold court with me on *any* relevant issue which requires philosophical, logical, or analytical ability to debate.

Heheheh... hehehe... heh.
Heh.
Sorry, that was friggin hilarious.
Post edited October 05, 2009 by michaelleung
Posted October 05, 2009
Ladies and Gentlemen, may I present the new definition of "waste of breath"?
Posted October 05, 2009
I'm with you, anjohl. Just ignore these idiots whose collective brains were outsmarted by a bunch of bananas.
Mmmmm...sweet, luscious, ripe bananas.
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
SteamMonke: Sorry for the tripple post, it appears that anonymous posting is a little broken today. The above two posts were actually one post but for some reason the reply was deleted when I went to post it, hence the second post to repost my actual response.
You may now return to your Steam bashing and plotting of law suits that won't have a chance of getting to court!

Being angry about the way you are treated by a company and service you have been supporting and using for 5 years can excuse a little bashing, especially when said company does not make it a practice to TELL the person why an account has been disabled. It's now Monday afternoon in Steamville and I still have not had any reply from Steam support and my account is still disabled.
Poor customer support is poor customer support any way you say it. To make matters worse when this happened to Weclock I was one of the people who was telling him not to bash Steam over this EXACT SAME ISSUE. Makes me look like quite the fool does it not?
The whole issue of communication is the problem and this is the first time I have ever seen a service suspended without any communication whatsoever and in my oppinion its a totally unacceptable practice especially with an account that has been active for so long. Therefore I will bash and I will make snarky comments on Twitter knowing that Gabe looks at his account and I will blogbash if there is any chance Valve may change this practice.
For the record I already said that attempting to sue Valve was silly.
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
SteamMonke: Sorry for the tripple post, it appears that anonymous posting is a little broken today. The above two posts were actually one post but for some reason the reply was deleted when I went to post it, hence the second post to repost my actual response.
You may now return to your Steam bashing and plotting of law suits that won't have a chance of getting to court!
avatar
Delixe: It's now Monday afternoon in Steamville and I still have not had any reply from Steam support and my account is still disabled.

It's not. It's actually 9 AM in the West coast.
Posted October 05, 2009
Valve don't tend to start work for another 40 odd minutes.
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
bansama: Valve don't tend to start work for another 40 odd minutes.

Gabe Newell doesn't tend to start work until he finishes his thirtieth plate of waffles.
Posted October 05, 2009
avatar
michaelleung: It's not. It's actually 9 AM in the West coast.

Ah, I keep forgetting they are based in Washington. Probably was thinking of Stardock there.
avatar
bansama: Valve don't tend to start work for another 40 odd minutes.
avatar
michaelleung: Gabe Newell doesn't tend to start work until he finishes his thirtieth plate of waffles.

I was under the impression the waffles were only the appetiser?
Post edited October 05, 2009 by Delixe
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)You know how you should never tempt fate?(161 posts)(161 posts)
(161 posts)