cogadh: No, Motorola is demanding exorbitant licensing fees from Microsoft that are well beyond the market standard and Microsoft is fighting it. For once, Microsoft is not the one in the wrong here. Kavazovangel posted this pic in the other thread that explains it very clearly:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-egCdCQfOYgY/T3dLa1LjTrI/AAAAAAAAAX4/mIiryUnYncE/s1600/MMI%2B%2527RAND%2527%2Boffer%2BH.264.png DukeNukemForever: My point about Microsoft was about the misuse of market power, not the high fees. That the fees are too high and Microsoft wants to change that is ok, but as far as I understand from some german articles it's also about Motorolas misuse of market power. Maybe I read that in the wrong way, but still for me it sounds a little bit funny. Btw, it's not only about the video codec, it's also about wlan standards.
And my point is this time you've got it backwards. Microsoft is not trying to change anything or misuse market power, they were actually working within the established laws and standards. Motorola is the one who is trying to change the game and they are misusing the German courts to do so. Regardless of what the entire argument is about, the video codec numbers illustrate the problem quite clearly: Motorola is just being greedy, most likely at the prompting of soon to be owner Google, who has a vested interest in forcing Microsoft to either pay up or switch to Google's own H.264 alternative standard, WebM.