It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
tejozaszaszas: Anti americanism is one of the major european sickness, USA have a dark side as every powerful nation but we owe to them much of our freedom.
Unfortunately the America that rebuilt europe died with Kennedy. This is the America that flattened Laos and supported death squads throughout south america in the 80s, and likes to gorge upon consumerism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOshw4kIGR4

/\
American
avatar
tejozaszaszas: Anti americanism is one of the major european sickness, USA have a dark side as every powerful nation but we owe to them much of our freedom.
And the Americans owe much of their freedom to you guys (well, Spain & France mostly).
avatar
tejozaszaszas: Anti americanism is one of the major european sickness, USA have a dark side as every powerful nation but we owe to them much of our freedom.
avatar
billt568: Unfortunately the America that rebuilt europe died with Kennedy. This is the America that flattened Laos and supported death squads throughout south america in the 80s, and likes to gorge upon consumerism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOshw4kIGR4

/\
American
Our country has a less than spectacular history. It doesn't mean every civilian in it does, though. I'm as sick as anyone about some of the things that have happened, but I know I cannot change it.
I hope you didn't get me wrong with my last post. I have absolutely nothing against you guys, the people, the citizens. :)

Its your government that I am disgusted with. :)
avatar
KavazovAngel: Fear is beautiful, baby.
avatar
ovoon: Good? GOOD? This is terrible... open press I'm fine with, but putting lives in danger, and for what? Thats not ok.
avatar
KavazovAngel: Please stop with this crap already. You (US) really should think bout this before sending your kids in useless wars against terrorists.

Think about who the real terrorists are first. ;)

You guys have only yourself to blame.

(EDIT: I have nothing against you guys, the people, just everything against your government)
Yes, because I AM the united states of america! Because all of us are the same. Just because I live in this place means nothing. I don't send anyone anywhere, and did you know that 80% of the population feel that were going in the wrong direction? That were not happy with what were doing?
avatar
KingofGnG: Best thing this year brought thus far. At least from an Italian standpoint: now the world too knows what kind of disgusting mafioso, asshole and son of a shit bitch Silvio Berlusconi is.

Please, someone bomb us.
Italy I envy You!
Berlusconi has at least some personality. Polish politicians are so boring and lame.
Only one sex scandal and one suicide in recent years:-(
Unfortunately Poles have very serious problems with long-term memory and elect them time after time.

EDIT: Lepper & Co. was fun though.
Post edited November 30, 2010 by Mal_Khar
avatar
CymTyr: You think we have the right to complain and remove people from office? Very very few places in the States let the citizens get away with that. Also, popular vote is meaningless here as most elected officials are elected through the ELECTORAL COLLEGE.
I don't generally disagree with your self-righteous indignation and anger... however, exactly two elected officials are elected through the Electoral College, and one is the Vice President, who you don't even vote for. He or she is simply attached to the ticket.

And only twice in our history has the victory gone to a candidate who did not win the popular vote.

I have long advocated the abolition of the EC and the implementation of of a direct election, however the EC is not the hotbed of corruption and the denial of democracy that it is often made out to be. It's just a system that made a lot more sense 200 years ago than it does today (IMO).

You do, in fact, directly elect every elected official in this nation from Senator to County Coroner. They are all term limited, too... they are term limited by elections.
avatar
KavazovAngel: Fear is beautiful, baby.


Please stop with this crap already. You (US) really should think bout this before sending your kids in useless wars against terrorists.

Think about who the real terrorists are first. ;)

You guys have only yourself to blame.

(EDIT: I have nothing against you guys, the people, just everything against your government)
avatar
ovoon: Yes, because I AM the united states of america! Because all of us are the same. Just because I live in this place means nothing. I don't send anyone anywhere, and did you know that 80% of the population feel that were going in the wrong direction? That were not happy with what were doing?
Please read my other post. :) I'm sorry if I offended you personally in any way, it was not my intention. That's why I wrote the other post to make sure someone doesn't get offended personally. :)
Post edited November 30, 2010 by KavazovAngel
avatar
CymTyr: You think we have the right to complain and remove people from office? Very very few places in the States let the citizens get away with that. Also, popular vote is meaningless here as most elected officials are elected through the ELECTORAL COLLEGE.
avatar
HoneyBakedHam: I don't generally disagree with your self-righteous indignation and anger... however, exactly two elected officials are elected through the Electoral College, and one is the Vice President, who you don't even vote for. He or she is simply attached to the ticket.

And only twice in our history has the victory gone to a candidate who did not win the popular vote.

I have long advocated the abolition of the EC and the implementation of of a direct election, however the EC is not the hotbed of corruption and the denial of democracy that it is often made out to be. It's just a system that made a lot more sense 200 years ago than it does today (IMO).

You do, in fact, directly elect every elected official in this nation from Senator to County Coroner. They are all term limited, too... they are term limited by elections.
I am not indignant nor am I angry. And during elections I have always been taught that the majority of our leaders get elected through the EC, not the popular vote. Obviously you learned differently. I guess I am either uninformed, or my instructors were wrong.

No, seriously. I'm not indignant or angry. But us Statesians really are not free, no matter what anyone thinks. It's just a fact.

EDIT Oh wow. I totally misread your post. No, maybe the popular vote does count, I was just taught at school it didn't.

You should see me when I really have something to say ;)
Post edited November 30, 2010 by CymTyr
avatar
CymTyr: I am not indignant nor am I angry.
Well... first... I surely didn't mean that in a negative way. If you feel as if your vote is useless then you feel disenfranchised, and you'd have every right to feel angry.

I think anyone not angry is either making a few million dollars after taxes each year, or isn't paying attention.

avatar
CymTyr: And during elections I have always been taught that the majority of our leaders get elected through the EC, not the popular vote. Obviously you learned differently. I guess I am either uninformed, or my instructors were wrong.

No, seriously. I'm not indignant or angry. But us Statesians really are not free, no matter what anyone thinks. It's just a fact.

EDIT Oh wow. I totally misread your post. No, maybe the popular vote does count, I was just taught at school it didn't.

You should see me when I really have something to say ;)
Well, you say we aren't free... Compared to whom?

I agree that our civil liberties are at greater risk than they have been in the past, and I agree that your social, economic, or ethnic class will have varying degrees of effect on each individual's freedom in this nation. And I think we have a lot of work to do.

But as much of a leftist radical as I might be... when you say we aren't free, I just gotta wonder why you think that in such glaringly absolute terms.

I mean, try being a woman in Saudi Arabia or Syria or Iraq. Try being from the wrong tribal heritage in Darfur. Try being Taiwanese or Tibetan under the yoke of the Chinese government.

And I'm honestly asking why you say that. I might not disagree, but as a general claim without supporting arguments, I just don't know what you mean, and I want to hear what you have to say...
avatar
CymTyr: You think we have the right to complain and remove people from office? Very very few places in the States let the citizens get away with that. Also, popular vote is meaningless here as most elected officials are elected through the ELECTORAL COLLEGE.
avatar
HoneyBakedHam: I don't generally disagree with your self-righteous indignation and anger... however, exactly two elected officials are elected through the Electoral College, and one is the Vice President, who you don't even vote for. He or she is simply attached to the ticket.

And only twice in our history has the victory gone to a candidate who did not win the popular vote.

I have long advocated the abolition of the EC and the implementation of of a direct election, however the EC is not the hotbed of corruption and the denial of democracy that it is often made out to be. It's just a system that made a lot more sense 200 years ago than it does today (IMO).

You do, in fact, directly elect every elected official in this nation from Senator to County Coroner. They are all term limited, too... they are term limited by elections.
You don't really, the people on the ballot aren't chosen by you. They are chosen by two parties, and if you don't like them, too damned bad.

Electoral college is important, for those two positions. The President decides who the USSC judges will be (confirmed by congress), they are in for life.

And term limits don't mean what you imply. Term limits mean exactly what it means when you are president, i.e. you can't hold the office for more than X (in this example, 2) consecutive terms. Most offices in the US Federal government have no term limits.
avatar
HoneyBakedHam: I don't generally disagree with your self-righteous indignation and anger... however, exactly two elected officials are elected through the Electoral College, and one is the Vice President, who you don't even vote for. He or she is simply attached to the ticket.

And only twice in our history has the victory gone to a candidate who did not win the popular vote.

I have long advocated the abolition of the EC and the implementation of of a direct election, however the EC is not the hotbed of corruption and the denial of democracy that it is often made out to be. It's just a system that made a lot more sense 200 years ago than it does today (IMO).

You do, in fact, directly elect every elected official in this nation from Senator to County Coroner. They are all term limited, too... they are term limited by elections.
avatar
orcishgamer: You don't really, the people on the ballot aren't chosen by you. They are chosen by two parties, and if you don't like them, too damned bad.

Electoral college is important, for those two positions. The President decides who the USSC judges will be (confirmed by congress), they are in for life.

And term limits don't mean what you imply. Term limits mean exactly what it means when you are president, i.e. you can't hold the office for more than X (in this example, 2) consecutive terms. Most offices in the US Federal government have no term limits.
Could you imagine how screwed we'd be if there was no Preidential term limit and Bush got "voted" in again and again. We'd be in a mad max/fallout/wasteland/dr strangelove scnario before our heads stopped spinning.
avatar
GameRager: ]Could you imagine how screwed we'd be if there was no Preidential term limit and Bush got "voted" in again and again. We'd be in a mad max//fallout//wasteland//dr strangelove scnario before our heads stopped spinning.
I'm pretty sure Bush was doomed even if he could have run again. He had extremely low approval ratings in his second term.
avatar
orcishgamer: You don't really, the people on the ballot aren't chosen by you. They are chosen by two parties, and if you don't like them, too damned bad.

Electoral college is important, for those two positions. The President decides who the USSC judges will be (confirmed by congress), they are in for life.

And term limits don't mean what you imply. Term limits mean exactly what it means when you are president, i.e. you can't hold the office for more than X (in this example, 2) consecutive terms. Most offices in the US Federal government have no term limits.
avatar
GameRager: Could you imagine how screwed we'd be if there was no Preidential term limit and Bush got "voted" in again and again. We'd be in a mad max/fallout/wasteland/dr strangelove scnario before our heads stopped spinning.
FDR was the one who proposed, and subsequently got instated, the two term limit. It was for that exact same reason. He figured a leader that was popular enough to be voted in over and over again might get it in his/her head to take advantage of the public's adulation.
avatar
GameRager: ]Could you imagine how screwed we'd be if there was no Preidential term limit and Bush got "voted" in again and again. We'd be in a mad max//fallout//wasteland//dr strangelove scnario before our heads stopped spinning.
avatar
orcishgamer: I'm pretty sure Bush was doomed even if he could have run again. He had extremely low approval ratings in his second term.
Bush wasn't even legally voted in in the second election for certain(remember that ohio thing they invetigated concerning rigged voting machines and people routing voters to the wrong polling places and shite), and the first time he got in I'm sure his brother jeb had something to do with the forced manual recount which caused gore to back down instead of waiting for the results.
avatar
GameRager: Could you imagine how screwed we'd be if there was no Preidential term limit and Bush got "voted" in again and again. We'd be in a mad max/fallout/wasteland/dr strangelove scnario before our heads stopped spinning.
avatar
predcon: FDR was the one who proposed, and subsequently got instated, the two term limit. It was for that exact same reason. He figured a leader that was popular enough to be voted in over and over again might get it in his/her head to take advantage of the public's adulation.
Lucky for us, then, that Washington didn't take too much advantage of his situation in what was basicaly the only unlimited year term presidency.
Post edited December 01, 2010 by GameRager