I think its slowly beginning. The first big cyber war. All pieces and reasons seem to fit now.






[i]The first woman denounced him because the condom broke while having sex at Assange's apartment. Both were seen acting normally the next morning. It was only days after when the woman decided to accuse him of having sex with the broken condom.

The second woman's statement to the police is strange: The 27-year-old photographer said she went to the event because she is fascinated by Assange. She managed to get into a lunch with him and other people. Two days later they talked on the phone and she invited him to her apartment 40 miles from Stockholm, paying for his ticket because—according to her—Assange had no cash or credit cards.

Then she complained to the police that "he paid more attention to his computer rather than me" on the train ride, and that "the passion and excitement seemed to have disappeared" when they arrived to her apartment. However, they still had sex using a condom that night.

The next morning they had sex again, but this time Assange didn't use a condom. According to the New York Times, friends of the woman say that he did not comply with her appeals to stop unless he wore a condom. They had sex anyway. Assange claims that she didn't force her in any case. Talking to the police, she didn't accuse him of rape, but of not using a condom that morning.[/i]

http://gizmodo.com/5705430/wikileaks-julian-assange-is-not-accused-of-rape

http://www.wikileaks.ch/articles/2010/PayPal-freezes-WikiLeaks-donations.html

and

http://www.wikileaks.ch/articles/2010/Test,32.html

now, the payback happens as "Operation: Payback": http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/12/4chan-rushes-to-wikileaks-defense-forces-swiss-banking-site-offline.ars

Wait, so Interpol issued a Red Notice (or whatever it's called) on Assange for... wait for it... having sex without a condom. LMAO! Okay, seriously, when has THAT ever happened in the world?

I don't know what "asked him not to" means, since she didn't file an immediate police report. I somehow doubt it means rape in the conventional sense. I suspect it means "we need a condom." "it'll be fine baby", cheesy porn music ensues. A scenario I'm guessing has played out over 1000 times worldwide in the time it took me to type this.

Apparently Anonymous is attacking anyone who doesn't support WikiLeaks, in effect creating one of the most ironic statements ever.

Nope. I'm angry against TheCheese33 because he openly calls for Assange's murder. That's all. The fact tha TheCheese33 is against Wikileaks, I don't care. It's his opinion and he has absolutely every right to express it. But I do believe that he (or she, after all) crosses the red line by openly stating that Assange should be killed, either by him/her or by anybody else.

On real forums, his post would already have been deleted, or maybe his account banned, for such a statement. Surprisingly, here on GOG nothing happens. Even a very small number of GOGers think it's going too far to call for Assange's murder. That scares me.

At least he's in jail now, so we don't need to worry about killing him. Crisis averted.

It's not that I just want him dead. I just think he's a dangerous character that should be stopped, whether that means jailing him or killing him. Since he's been captured, everything is okay.

And should be released soon, as they have nothing on him.

How will you feel when he is awarded the Nobel Peace Prize next year?

Anyhoo, if he is taken out of the picture, I hope someone takes his place. The negative attention Assange is receiving from the powers under scrutiny would have me believe his organization is on the right track.

Paypal has as much credibility as a money laundering business venture. They behave like a bank with people's money but they don't align themselves under any law banks are under. I tell everyone to skip paypal and try other methods. I dont know why they are so popular, almost steam-like popular with a rabid base of fanboys..
Yes exactly. They're doing a favour actually by sending him to jail, turning him into some kind of hero being thrown to jail for standing against the tyrannical powers that be.

The same way I felt when Obama was awarded it.
"Yeah, nothing political about that"

Like John Perry Barlow recently tweeted, this is truly an infowar. At least now 4chan is coming to the aid of wikileaks. : )

Even supporters of his movement should hope he is replaced already. He is an egotistical fool, and only wants the attention.

The movement should be many, not one. Anyone who truly believes in the message he's been half-heartedly preaching should realize that.

Also, just a heads up: This kind of mentality and rationale is just horrible.

Either that, or child molesters and Charles Manson were "on the right track".

Define fool, that word doesn't seem to mean to you what it means to me. He seems extraordinarily successful at his task.
When why do so many try and rationalize government behavior that's far worse than that stuff?