Posted February 27, 2012
Jalixx3: MonstaMunch, there have been times and places that a sexy woman was on the cover, no question (even if there were no women at all in the game or book). Also, making a female character into a fantasy object does not just involve fabric removal. The female characters still could have been interesting, complex people. But note how their character bios are all focused on their relationships to men. They have no other thoughts to offer about themselves
1. Yes, the cover is far more graphic than anything you'll find in the actual game (as I already noted). This is the source of my confusion. In terms of the game art, you'd have seen the most offensive thing it had to offer before you even made the purchase. 2. As noted, if you want interesting, complicated characters, play Planescape. I don't think the men in Divine Divinity are any more interesting than the women.
3. The phrase you quoted as having offended you "voice actresses were purring about how they were "better than men." " Of all the things for a self proclaimed feminist to get upset about, that's not one I would have expected.
Catoblepas: I see this brought up time and time again, but this argument is just misleading. The typical Harakles/Conan style 'barbarian' in a lot of fantasy games may be underdressed, but to dismiss it as 'the same thing' (paraphrased) as its similarly dressed female counterparts in fantasy is rather misleading. The musclebound, half naked male hero is connected pretty heavily with heroism through its connection with physical strength and capacity for violence.
Some women might find "musclebound, half naked male heroes" that are associated ith "heroism and physical strength" attractive. They are probably the female equivilent of the type of males that find "chain mail bikini clad warrior princesses who proclaim themselves to be better than men" attractive.Post edited February 27, 2012 by MonstaMunch