I believe in nurturing and valuing that which matters to me, while being open towards and respecting that which matters to others.
In the end, for me, I believe it is best to believing nothing. I do think the scientific method and common logic sense has a lot going for them though. As you can tell, I'm not a pious man myself. To each his own.

I never said I don't care about what others think. I said that we both have different definition, and I also said that I was perfectly fine with that. And next time you want to debate, don't draw your wikipedia link as fast as you can, like it's an absolute truth.

The difference between strong atheism and weak atheism is the level of faith. A strong atheist has faith in his/her belief that there is no god. Just like a strong theist has faith in their belief that their definitely is a god.
It does not mean they are stupid. Many strong atheists are aware that they are taking a faith position, just as many theists are aware that they are taking a faith position. Often that position of faith comes from a particular set of life experiences that "proves" to a particular person that there must or must not be a god.

Being atheist, I don't subscribe to any religion.

Ohm, then let's add "medium", "true", "hardcore" and such? Come on, "i'm a level 10 atheist, therefore i'm more faithful than you"? Levels of faith are dumb.;P
That's not what i've said, please read in the context of what was said, and what i've commented, which was Navagon's: "Strong atheists claim outright that there is no god. Weak atheists simply don't have any belief in god(s). "
Thank You.

All hail the mighty C64. Infidels must die.

Belief. that's what it comes down to. Anyone that shaky clearly has belief. They may not want to admit it. In fact, they're that shaky, i'd be amazed if they did admit it. But it doesn't change anything.
They could sleep in every Sunday, but if they're completely unconvinced either way then they clearly believe there is a god.
You see what I did there? :p.
That is the problem. I fully agree that most of the "true" Agnostics believe one way or the other. But there is still the number who truly don't know if they believe or not. They may lean one way or another (or may be perfectly centered), but they still aren't convinced either way.
I can't imagine anyone who would truly fall into that category, but there are likely many.
So next time someone claims they are agnostic, keep in mind that you actually CAN be agnostic. They probably aren't, but you never know...
Let's pretend that last one was a clever comment and not a compete accident I realized right before hitting "post" :p

Pastafarian, of course. His faith is too delicious to not like.
Well, actually, according to Wikipedia I would be... some kind of... agnostic. Strong? Weak? Theist? Atheist? (It's flagged for original research). I don't really care. The Universe is a quite intricate thing, so there may or may not be a God that created it, but in the end I find the question to be irrelevant to me. I do know I don't believe in a "caring" God, but that's as far as I'm willing to think about it.

Nuwaubianism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuwaubianism
edit: Two stars :)

Atheist, but with goodwill towards many aspects of (catholic) Christianity.

Effective communication in any form requires conformity to established rules and definitions. You don't have to like it.

Because you think you had an "effective communication" ?. lol. Whatever makes you happy.
I agreed with that, since the beginning.

Oh, i forgot that, how could i!
I have to add "8-bit" then! :P
What are those? I mean, goodwill aspects that are Catholic, and not Christian?
[edit] Seems we have a new UK vs France war on a rise! ;P Ease up fellows! [/edit]

...and the direction some posts in this thread have gone is exactly why most public forums do not allow the discussion of Religion. Its a hot button topic that can often degenerate very badly.