Posted June 20, 2014
ChrisSD
vita brevis
Registered: Jun 2013
From United Kingdom
Tekkaman-James
Cereal Killer
Registered: May 2014
From United States
Posted June 20, 2014
Different strokes for different folks. There are some pretty weird tastes out there that wouldn't necessarily be deemed "porn" by the average person. But if an image elicits sexual arousal in a viewer, it is still porn as far as they are concerned.
DubConqueror: With Google personalising your search results I don't know what you get with gogbear, but I got: 6 images of a black and white bear saying life is sweet, 2 slices of paper with a saying and some lucky numbers, 1 avatar of a teenager face, 1 avatar of a baby's face and 2 blue avatars from a site called wowitemcreator. Seems very much safe for work to me.
In other words, what is a gogbear? Type into Google Image Search (at your own risk) this exactly: gogbear
Are you attempting to imply that I use my work PC to look at inappropriate content and, therefore, my search results in Google are showing me overweight guys in tiny speedos because it thinks that's what I want to see? If so, I take offense.
In other words, what is a gogbear?
Are you attempting to imply that I use my work PC to look at inappropriate content and, therefore, my search results in Google are showing me overweight guys in tiny speedos because it thinks that's what I want to see? If so, I take offense.
DubConqueror
proud to be a social jus- tice warrior
Registered: Jun 2010
From Netherlands
Posted June 20, 2014
Internet keeps surprising me. I've read and experienced google introduced the policy not to turn up with explicit images when something is not explicitely searched for (the name of a pornstar usually turns up only face and clothed images), yet 'pussies' doesn't reveal any cute kittens [just found out when trying to make a joke about full frontal nude kittens, but failing].
Sorry, I'm getting distracted into off-topic talk.
Tekkaman-James: Type into Google Image Search (at your own risk) this exactly: gogbear
Are you attempting to imply that I use my work PC to look at inappropriate content and, therefore, my search results in Google are showing me overweight guys in tiny speedos because it thinks that's what I want to see? If so, I take offense. Thanks for the explanation. I think it's neither my nor your fault that I can't see what you see. Your Google search is done on a US based Google and however I try to access Google.com, Google.us, due to Google being context sensitive it always will default to Google.nl on my rig and turn up the 10 items I described above.
But I found what you saw, by using Duckduckgo to search free of context:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gogbear THIS is NSFW! At least, not safe for those fat men's own health!
Sorry, I'm getting distracted into off-topic talk.
Are you attempting to imply that I use my work PC to look at inappropriate content and, therefore, my search results in Google are showing me overweight guys in tiny speedos because it thinks that's what I want to see? If so, I take offense.
But I found what you saw, by using Duckduckgo to search free of context:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gogbear THIS is NSFW! At least, not safe for those fat men's own health!
Post edited June 20, 2014 by DubConqueror
Tekkaman-James
Cereal Killer
Registered: May 2014
From United States
Posted June 20, 2014
But I found what you saw, by using Duckduckgo to search free of context:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gogbear THIS is NSFW! At least, not safe for those fat men's own health!
real.geizterfahr
Grumpy Old Gamer
Registered: Apr 2010
From Spain
Posted June 20, 2014
ncr is "no country redirect", so it won't redirect you to google.nl