It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I don't think they'd need to make special arrangements with any of the publishers to remove their DRM - they'd be more likely to handle it by putting out a final patch for the Steam client so that it no longer tries to authenticate (and tells any process/subprocess that asks that authentication was successful). It'd be a relatively small change compared to going in and altering every game's behavior.
avatar
KaelAlucard: People want to know what happens when Steam closes. (9 words!)
Basically someone wants to add the procedure of what'll happen to their Steam purchases if Valve/Steam goes under.
They do have a plan. Although I've known this for a long time so it's nothing new for me.
When Steam goes down one day? I can answer that in even fewer words. How about 5? Starts with 'you're' and ends with 'luck.'
avatar
StingingVelvet: Hmmm. I kind of consider making backups an inherent part of digital distribution.
avatar
Pheace: Eww to backing up media. So done with that. That's a big reason why I went digital to begin with :)
How do you protect your music and photos? I'm not talking about DVDs here, I'm talking about having them stored on two separate HDDs.
avatar
DarrkPhoenix: Unless it's been shown that patches to strip out the DRM are completed and being held in escrow by a third-party, along with legal agreements in place to ensure that these patches are released regardless of the wishes of new owners, publishers, creditors, or court-appointed executors, then such statements don't count for much.

Acquisitions, mergers, and especially bankruptcies can be quite messy when it comes to prior customer agreements and services, and it's very difficult to make any sort of promise that can reliably withstand one of the aforementioned events. The folks at Steam may have every intention of making their best effort to ensure people still have access to their games if Steam goes under or changes ownership, but even their best effort would likely amount to very little in such an event.
This is basically the fatal flaw of any argument that Valve will ensure that Steam games will work even if/when Steam shuts down. Once a company files for bankruptcy, the management loses all control over the company and its assets. So even if their desire to make Steam games playable is genuine, it wouldn't matter as it would cease to be up to them.

Plus, considering its poor reputation, I wouldn't rely on statements from Steam's support staff. For all intents and purposes, the claim is still a total myth.
avatar
Gandos: Plus, considering its poor reputation, I wouldn't rely on statements from Steam's support staff. For all intents and purposes, the claim is still a total myth.
They have a poor reputation? I've always heard they're slow but very effective. That was my experience as well.
avatar
DarrkPhoenix: Unless it's been shown that patches to strip out the DRM are completed and being held in escrow by a third-party, along with legal agreements in place to ensure that these patches are released regardless of the wishes of new owners, publishers, creditors, or court-appointed executors, then such statements don't count for much.

Acquisitions, mergers, and especially bankruptcies can be quite messy when it comes to prior customer agreements and services, and it's very difficult to make any sort of promise that can reliably withstand one of the aforementioned events. The folks at Steam may have every intention of making their best effort to ensure people still have access to their games if Steam goes under or changes ownership, but even their best effort would likely amount to very little in such an event.
Precisely. Could not have said it better myself.
I could claim that after I cease to exist I will visit the dreams of my clients and give them good advice from my unique vantage point in the spirit world.

It wouldn't really mean that I would really be in position to do so, and even if I had put this promise out in a way that was resembling to be somehow legally binding - which Steam doesn't seem to be doing - well. I guess then you would have an excellent standing to sue me.

If it wasn't for the fact I no longer exist, that is.
avatar
DarrkPhoenix: Unless it's been shown that patches to strip out the DRM are completed and being held in escrow by a third-party, along with legal agreements in place to ensure that these patches are released regardless of the wishes of new owners, publishers, creditors, or court-appointed executors, then such statements don't count for much.

Acquisitions, mergers, and especially bankruptcies can be quite messy when it comes to prior customer agreements and services, and it's very difficult to make any sort of promise that can reliably withstand one of the aforementioned events. The folks at Steam may have every intention of making their best effort to ensure people still have access to their games if Steam goes under or changes ownership, but even their best effort would likely amount to very little in such an event.
avatar
Gandos: This is basically the fatal flaw of any argument that Valve will ensure that Steam games will work even if/when Steam shuts down. Once a company files for bankruptcy, the management loses all control over the company and its assets. So even if their desire to make Steam games playable is genuine, it wouldn't matter as it would cease to be up to them.

Plus, considering its poor reputation, I wouldn't rely on statements from Steam's support staff. For all intents and purposes, the claim is still a total myth.
What if Valve require all developers and publishers that put games on Steam to sign an agreement allowing Valve to remove the DRM in the case Steam gets taking down? I believe I have seen it mention by I THINK Interceptor's CEO Frederik Schreiber. But I am not 100% sure.
It is extremely unlikely that Valve will go out of business because of the amount of money Steam is making. So, if Valve does go out of business, it will be due to financial mismanagement.

The financial management will have nothing to do with Steam, which likely will still be hugely profitable. Therefore, another company -- most likely EA, Activations or Microsoft -- will buy and take over Steam should Valve go out of business. Steam is a business unit by itself the can be sold off and separate from Valve. So Steam will continue without Valve.
Post edited June 06, 2014 by ktchong
Of course they will one day go out of business - every company does. And of course they will make all kinds of assurances and promises to soothe your concerns, none of which you can be certain they will be able keep.

For me the emblematic example of what happens when a business like this goes under is what happened with JManga.

It's easy to feel that while a company is popular and large that it will always remain so. But as long as they, and not you, hold the assets you pay for, their troubles become your own.
A promise only involve those believing it.
avatar
Emob78: I can answer that in even fewer words. How about 5? Starts with 'you're' and ends with 'luck.'
Erm...mind enlarging on them? I can see that "you're out of luck" would work, but that's only four words...
avatar
solzariv: I'm not clicking on a reddit link. Summarize it in 10 words or less.
Took me hours... "Steam games would still work if Steam ever shuts down"
avatar
pi4t: Erm...mind enlarging on them? I can see that "you're out of luck" would work, but that's only four words...
You're poop out of luck. :P
avatar
solzariv: I'm not clicking on a reddit link. Summarize it in 10 words or less.
avatar
muttly13: Took me hours... "Steam games would still work if Steam ever shuts down"
That's not what it says though. It says :"Vague platitudes *mumble* *mublee* don't worry your pretty little head about it".