Personally, I neither get the desperate need for everyone to like the same things as I, nor the need to isolate myself from others and act all elitist. Seems like the typical minority dilemma to me, either crave for recognition and approval from the majority people or sulkily exclude them in retaliation for their lack of understanding. What is it with this zebra thinking, why does it always have to be either/or and everything taken to the extreme?
Anyway, myself, I want a wide variety of games; games that cater to my old tastes and games that let me experience something different that I might acquire a new taste for. Innovation and progress seldom come only from catering to the specific tastes of small groups. I would find it kind of boring if games only ever gave me what I expected from them because they confine themselves to what I know and like already - the same way as I'd find it kind of boring if everyone liked and played the same games as me or if all games would cater to the lowest common denominator of the majority. The more people get into gaming, the more mainstream games will get made, true - but the more individuals get into gaming, the more individual niches will appear, too. I don't see mainstream and niche as irreconcilable, but as complementary. In the end, there will be more games for everyone to choose from.
Apart from that, while I don't need everyone to understand why I like gaming, I'm not too keen on having to defend myself for it on every occasion either, so I don't mind the side effects of gaming getting more popular as a hobby. And it can be quite nice to share something you enjoy with the people you love, as opposed to random strangers on the internet. ;)
Tarm: Ha ha. I think I lost myself half way through my own post. Incoherent to say the least.
Actually, your post made a lot of sense to me. I guess I feel the
same way, yay! :D