Porkdish: I have seen some schemes, and it was mentioned as a possibility on the runic forums where the number of unlocks resets over time. This seems like a fine idea to me and covers your ass in later years.
DarrkPhoenix: It's still a potential headache. I had been considering this title, but currently have no interest until a no-strings-attached version is available. Basically the way this plays out in my mind is that it's a game from a fairly small unknown developer, that's not particularly heavy on content (estimated playtime is 10-20 hours according to the devs), and at $20 that's already about at the limit of what I'm ready to pay assuming I like the demo. Throw any kind of activation DRM nonsense into that mix and it's simply thanks but no thanks.
The part that bothers me is that the developers refuse to answer the DRM question that I asked in this
Thread. I started to ask near the bottom of page 2.
Tell me, what is the risk of being honest?
Why not at least answer users concerns about DRM as best they can, and leave out the vague "maybe" there will be DRM "maybe" there won't; just say something like, "we have not decided, but we will let you know when we do".
I quickly lose faith in a developer that cannot/will not answer this question that is very important to many people.
Let me show you a developer that has no trouble answering the DRM question.
Eschalon Book II DRM answer.
I know which one I will be buying when it is available.