It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
kavazovangel: A beautiful picture would suit the wall a lot more than some crap like that, regardless of this case.
avatar
TCMU2009: I also don't get why so many people in my faith are up in arms about the prayer in public school debate. If you believe in an omniscient, loving God, then you don't need state sanctioned prayer times to communicate. Besides, Jesus specifically stated some of the best times to pray are by yourself without distractions. Honestly, some Christians are just as sensitive as this girl. But my point is how she's acting like a spoiled, prejudiced baby. She's just hiding behind the Constitution to do so.
Look, I get that a lot of people on this forum maybe weren't old enough to have gone to school back when prayers did occur in school (US, and I mean secular schools, not religious schools). The thing is, it didn't mean "all prayer" it meant "the only right-thinking prayer, Christian of course!" We've had "under God" added to the Pledge of Allegiance (yep, we mutilated our national pledge because it failed to acknowledge god and our government's subservience to him) and every candidate for any political office of any consequence is suddenly expected to go to church, and not just any church, we all know how it turns out if you dare be Muslim, you must verbally reject that and be Christian.

Maybe you could take a moment and realize it is kind of bullshit to force religion, especially a specific type of religion, on people while they try to interact with their government. And despite the persecution complex so many Christians have, it's them doing a lot of the forcing (in the US at least).

All the city had to do, as MonstaMunch said, is realize that there's a fuckton of legal precedent on her side and to man up and remove it. It's not an appropriate place for it, we've already decided that as a nation.

EDIT: I love how she's being ridiculed by both her classmates and several people here for actually being one of the few kids in the public school system who fucking learned something at school and applied it by pointing out the school's hypocrisy.

EDIT EDIT: And yes, for the record, if I wasn't clear, I went through part of my schooling when school prayer was both allowed and there was "prayer time" right in the fucking middle of class.
Post edited February 05, 2012 by orcishgamer
This doesn't make me angry at all. Yeah it's a bit petty to get so worked up over a banner, but it's nice to see the minority win for once.
Post edited February 05, 2012 by maycett
avatar
stoicsentry: Well, it had been up for 50 years. Eh, honestly it would be nice if atheists focused on more pressing matters.
It wasn't "the atheists" who did this, it was a 16 year old girl who did something about the situation in her own high school.
avatar
stoicsentry: Well, it had been up for 50 years. Eh, honestly it would be nice if atheists focused on more pressing matters.
avatar
spindown: It wasn't "the atheists" who did this, it was a 16 year old girl who did something about the situation in her own high school.
What's more the people acting poorly in this matter is not the 16 year old girl, if the news story is even half accurate.
avatar
TCMU2009: I also don't get why so many people in my faith are up in arms about the prayer in public school debate. If you believe in an omniscient, loving God, then you don't need state sanctioned prayer times to communicate. Besides, Jesus specifically stated some of the best times to pray are by yourself without distractions. Honestly, some Christians are just as sensitive as this girl. But my point is how she's acting like a spoiled, prejudiced baby. She's just hiding behind the Constitution to do so.
avatar
orcishgamer: Look, I get that a lot of people on this forum maybe weren't old enough to have gone to school back when prayers did occur in school (US, and I mean secular schools, not religious schools). The thing is, it didn't mean "all prayer" it meant "the only right-thinking prayer, Christian of course!" We've had "under God" added to the Pledge of Allegiance (yep, we mutilated our national pledge because it failed to acknowledge god and our government's subservience to him) and every candidate for any political office of any consequence is suddenly expected to go to church, and not just any church, we all know how it turns out if you dare be Muslim, you must verbally reject that and be Christian.

Maybe you could take a moment and realize it is kind of bullshit to force religion, especially a specific type of religion, on people while they try to interact with their government. And despite the persecution complex so many Christians have, it's them doing a lot of the forcing (in the US at least).

All the city had to do, as MonstaMunch said, is realize that there's a fuckton of legal precedent on her side and to man up and remove it. It's not an appropriate place for it, we've already decided that as a nation.

EDIT: I love how she's being ridiculed by both her classmates and several people here for actually being one of the few kids in the public school system who fucking learned something at school and applied it by pointing out the school's hypocrisy.

EDIT EDIT: And yes, for the record, if I wasn't clear, I went through part of my schooling when school prayer was both allowed and there was "prayer time" right in the fucking middle of class.
To a certain extent, you're right. But considering that there isn't a single person in here that's ADVOCATING what the school did, you're rant about school prayer is completely unnecessary.
avatar
TCMU2009: I do think the school kind of asked for it by putting up a prayer banner
avatar
MonstaMunch: No, they asked for it by fighting to be allowed to keep it in a court of law. They may simply have been ignorant of the law when they chose to put up the banner, but their lawyers don't have the same excuse for advising the school that they should fight it.
avatar
TCMU2009: I also think that people like her should just suck it up
avatar
MonstaMunch: So if people were to ignore the constitution in the name of another religion, let's say Islam, you think people should "just suck it up" too? Or do you think that only applies to Christianity?
Uh, yeah, I think it's fine if a Muslim wants to put up a prayer rug or something in school. If they had a christian prayer banner, then I have no problem with them putting up other religious items. This is a large country, and like it or not, you are going to meet people with differing faiths. Is she going to cry like a baby and run to the ACLU's tit every time she sees a cross or crescent in a public space, or every time someone kneels by their locker to say a quick prayer? That's what I mean by suck it up. I don't care what the damn constitution or legal precedent says, anyone with an ounce of common sense would just leave the prayer banner (however stupid and misguided) alone and not turn it into some self righteous legal battle that hurts everyone involved. I hate people who put the constitution and "rights" above common sense and health. But that's another issue.
avatar
orcishgamer: And despite the persecution complex so many Christians have, it's them doing a lot of the forcing (in the US at least).
Oh, they tried to make it a mandatory class for primary school students around here, so that the kids could learn about the love of Jesus that is all so wonderful, and sweet, and ... fuck it that's enough :D. Why the fuck would a 10 year old kid need to learn about some crap some dude two freaking thousand years ago wrote just to have fun with those near him, instead of spending that time doing more math, physics, chemistry, something that is ACTUALLY useful for his life?

But it got rejected in the main court, yet funny how the older people actually wanted kids to learn about that crap.
Post edited February 05, 2012 by kavazovangel
avatar
orcishgamer: Look, I get that a lot of people on this forum maybe weren't old enough to have gone to school back when prayers did occur in school (US, and I mean secular schools, not religious schools). The thing is, it didn't mean "all prayer" it meant "the only right-thinking prayer, Christian of course!" We've had "under God" added to the Pledge of Allegiance (yep, we mutilated our national pledge because it failed to acknowledge god and our government's subservience to him) and every candidate for any political office of any consequence is suddenly expected to go to church, and not just any church, we all know how it turns out if you dare be Muslim, you must verbally reject that and be Christian.

Maybe you could take a moment and realize it is kind of bullshit to force religion, especially a specific type of religion, on people while they try to interact with their government. And despite the persecution complex so many Christians have, it's them doing a lot of the forcing (in the US at least).

All the city had to do, as MonstaMunch said, is realize that there's a fuckton of legal precedent on her side and to man up and remove it. It's not an appropriate place for it, we've already decided that as a nation.

EDIT: I love how she's being ridiculed by both her classmates and several people here for actually being one of the few kids in the public school system who fucking learned something at school and applied it by pointing out the school's hypocrisy.

EDIT EDIT: And yes, for the record, if I wasn't clear, I went through part of my schooling when school prayer was both allowed and there was "prayer time" right in the fucking middle of class.
avatar
jefequeso: To a certain extent, you're right. But considering that there isn't a single person in here that's ADVOCATING what the school did, you're rant about school prayer is completely unnecessary.
Seriously Orcishgamer, calm the hell down. No one here, not even me, said that public prayer was a good idea. What I'm saying is that a completely harmless prayer banner was blown way out of proportion by a girl who clearly has a superiority complex about her beliefs. A little common sense applied here would have eliminated any problem. Your rant just makes you sound as bitter and anti religious as her.
avatar
TCMU2009: I don't care what the damn constitution or legal precedent says
<.<
avatar
TCMU2009: Uh, yeah, I think it's fine if a Muslim wants to put up a prayer rug or something in school. If they had a christian prayer banner, then I have no problem with them putting up other religious items. This is a large country, and like it or not, you are going to meet people with differing faiths. Is she going to cry like a baby and run to the ACLU's tit every time she sees a cross or crescent in a public space, or every time someone kneels by their locker to say a quick prayer? That's what I mean by suck it up. I don't care what the damn constitution or legal precedent says, anyone with an ounce of common sense would just leave the prayer banner (however stupid and misguided) alone and not turn it into some self righteous legal battle that hurts everyone involved. I hate people who put the constitution and "rights" above common sense and health. But that's another issue.
Sorry but the city is more responsible for turning it into a legal battle. They could've done the common sense thing and took it down.

I'm all for people working things out amongst themselves to find solutions that everyone can live with and be happy with, but when that isn't possible, we have the law. The law is clearly on her side and the city, not her, deserve the blame for taking it to court and wasting public money on a case that was doomed to fail.
Post edited February 05, 2012 by crazy_dave
avatar
MonstaMunch: No, they asked for it by fighting to be allowed to keep it in a court of law. They may simply have been ignorant of the law when they chose to put up the banner, but their lawyers don't have the same excuse for advising the school that they should fight it.



So if people were to ignore the constitution in the name of another religion, let's say Islam, you think people should "just suck it up" too? Or do you think that only applies to Christianity?
avatar
TCMU2009: Uh, yeah, I think it's fine if a Muslim wants to put up a prayer rug or something in school. If they had a christian prayer banner, then I have no problem with them putting up other religious items. This is a large country, and like it or not, you are going to meet people with differing faiths. Is she going to cry like a baby and run to the ACLU's tit every time she sees a cross or crescent in a public space, or every time someone kneels by their locker to say a quick prayer? That's what I mean by suck it up. I don't care what the damn constitution or legal precedent says, anyone with an ounce of common sense would just leave the prayer banner (however stupid and misguided) alone and not turn it into some self righteous legal battle that hurts everyone involved. I hate people who put the constitution and "rights" above common sense and health. But that's another issue.
In general, people lose most of their common sense when religion is involved. And yes, before everyone starts stomping on me, I'm referring to both Christians AND Atheists. I wish people would put away their fucking pitchforks and stop letting dogma guide them, because the constant demonizing and hyperbole that goes on is pathetic.
avatar
TCMU2009: A little common sense applied here would have eliminated any problem.
Indeed. Too bad the school district and the city didn't show any.
avatar
TCMU2009: I don't care what the damn constitution or legal precedent says
avatar
MonstaMunch: <.<
I've said it before, in class even: when it comes to someone's well being and very life vs. the constitution, screw the constitution. Do what's best for the people involved. This isn't a very good example of my philosophy there, but it still sort of fits. It honestly baffles me how libertarians and many people in government act like the constitution is God, and how it doesn't change at all. Its a 200 year old piece of parchment, and it can be modified or changed to suite the situation.
avatar
jefequeso: In general, people lose most of their common sense when religion is involved. And yes, before everyone starts stomping on me, I'm referring to both Christians AND Atheists.
That is somewhat true, but note that it is actually the people who believe who are forcing their beliefs upon people, not those that don't believe.

You don't see churches and crap built by people who don't believe so that they could share the unbelief, so in a way, we at least have a case to be a bit angry about the whole religion crap.
avatar
TCMU2009: Uh, yeah, I think it's fine if a Muslim wants to put up a prayer rug or something in school. If they had a christian prayer banner, then I have no problem with them putting up other religious items. This is a large country, and like it or not, you are going to meet people with differing faiths. Is she going to cry like a baby and run to the ACLU's tit every time she sees a cross or crescent in a public space, or every time someone kneels by their locker to say a quick prayer? That's what I mean by suck it up. I don't care what the damn constitution or legal precedent says, anyone with an ounce of common sense would just leave the prayer banner (however stupid and misguided) alone and not turn it into some self righteous legal battle that hurts everyone involved. I hate people who put the constitution and "rights" above common sense and health. But that's another issue.
avatar
crazy_dave: Sorry but the city is just as if not more (since they had to know they were going to lose) responsible for turning it into a legal battle. They could've done the common sense thing and took it down.

I'm all for people working things out amongst themselves to find solutions that everyone can live with and be happy with, but when that isn't possible, we have the law. The law is clearly on her side and the city, not her, deserve the blame for taking it to court and wasting public money on a case that was doomed to fail.
Honestly, I'm going to have to side with you. Although the degree to which "separation of church and state" is enforced can sometimes tend towards the draconian in some areas, the fact of the matter is that it has at this point effectively become law, and the city really shouldn't have continued to fight in court. Or even fought in the first place.