Posted February 23, 2014
dirtyharry50: You are not breaking anything to me that I don't already know. I think you misunderstood my post. I've been meaning to post this view for a while actually. With the recent event that somewhat validates my view in my opinion, this seemed like good timing for it. One core value just got tossed. But this post is about a different one.
My view about this place overall is actually similar to yours except that it is further limited to just classic games and preferably for Mac.
The fact that this website exists doesn't bother me at all and I am well aware of my obvious options.
Fair enough. I apologize for the hostile way that I approached your post. However, I am inclined to believe that GOG.com will do whatever it needs to survive as a business and if that includes bringing companies on-board that set their own pricing, then so be it. My view about this place overall is actually similar to yours except that it is further limited to just classic games and preferably for Mac.
The fact that this website exists doesn't bother me at all and I am well aware of my obvious options.
It is unfortunate that it can't just be good *old* games but if their ability to acquire licenses for a niche pool of titles dried up (for whatever reason) and the business went stagnant, then you would still be upset.