jamyskis: Seems there's a lot of Niners fans disappointed as well. It wasn't so much wanting the Broncos to win, but rather something about what one of the Seahawks' cornerbacks said and wanting the Seahawks to lose as a result.
Trajhenkhetlive: Well aside from the poor sportsmanship of one player, Seattle for a few years (since 2010) led the league in PED suspensions. Just prior to the 2013 season, 5-6 players were suspended for PED's (A fair chunk being starters). Sherman was almost banned from play this season but got off on technicality. I guess you could make the argument that those players acted on their own, but with near 7 suspensions, at some point common sense would dictate the coaches and other players knew about it and either did nothing to resolve the epidemic or promote it.
Normally I could care less since my team didn't go and might even wish the current Super Bowl champs well on their way to face the Broncos (they are a fellow West Coast team). However, their winning and not being held accountable for a large volume of penalties pretty much sets a dangerous precedent that teams should go ahead and start giving players special "vitamins". In case your wondering the 49ers have no suspensions for PEDs in a long time.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/05/20/seahawks-lead-the-league-in-ped-suspensions-since-2010/
Pete Caroll avoiding some investigation when the college team he ran had a PED epidemic;
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/why-suspend-terrelle-pryor-but-not-pete-carroll/
Are you sure that means that there are actually more infractions? Considering how ineffectual the typical drug testing programs are in other sports, an additional one or two players testing positive is more likely an indication of being stupid about it than necessarily higher rates. I mean, just look at the success that amateurs have had at hooking up A-rod with PEDs. He never did test positive in any of his tests.
Waiting until somebody wins to crack down is really not the right approach. The NFL should have been cracking down on this years ago. Most professional sports don't take this seriously until well after the damage has been done. I know that the NFL, for as long as I can remember, has tolerated a considerable amount of dirty play, and that also needs to be fixed.
BTW: PEDs include a crapload of things that one wouldn't normally expect to be PEDs and would result in a positive test regardless of whether or not they impact the game. So, even when people do test positive, it's not as simple as one might imagine. And some of the best substances aren't directly detectable either.
I make no apologies for cheating, but I've been around long enough to know that any time we do something well, there's all sorts of insinuation that there's something wrong. And I tend to take it with a grain of salt.