It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Lone3wolf: Some 200 technical experts - including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia - reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analysed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.

And what did the "Conspiracy Theorists" do for research?


They watched a FUCKING YouTube video!!!!!!

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Yes these experts must be awesome. 9/11 is a scam get over it.
avatar
Lone3wolf: Some 200 technical experts - including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia - reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analysed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.

And what did the "Conspiracy Theorists" do for research?


They watched a FUCKING YouTube video!!!!!!

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
avatar
slash11: Yes these experts must be awesome. 9/11 is a scam get over it.
No it's the fact that essentially you're discounting all of them as being wrong because they're dumb or in on it. Double facepalm.....for when just one facepalm isn't enough to describe how daft one really is.
avatar
slash11: Yes these experts must be awesome. 9/11 is a scam get over it.
That's all you got? Pathetic.
Run along, little mind, before daddy wallops your arse.
avatar
slash11: Yes these experts must be awesome. 9/11 is a scam get over it.
avatar
Lone3wolf: That's all you got? Pathetic.
Run along, little mind, before daddy wallops your arse.
Must be the same awesome experts as the climate experts from the IPCC with their global warming scam or ?
And yes i can read the code of the climategate e-mails. It's complete charlatans work....
avatar
Lone3wolf: That's all you got? Pathetic.
Run along, little mind, before daddy wallops your arse.
avatar
slash11: Must be the same awesome experts as the climate experts from the IPCC with their global warming scam or ?
And yes i can read the code of the climategate e-mails. It's complete charlatans work....
Um, dude.....global warming has been proven by many scientists...all of them couldn't all be in on it.

Same for this.
avatar
Lone3wolf: That's all you got? Pathetic.
Run along, little mind, before daddy wallops your arse.
avatar
slash11: Must be the same awesome experts as the climate experts from the IPCC with their global warming scam or ?
And yes i can read the code of the climategate e-mails. It's complete charlatans work....
Non Sequiter. Your facts are uncoordinated.
Please try again.

What the hell has that to do with ANYTHING about 9/11? Still waiting for your proofs, too. Not forgot about those, so stop hand-waving, and address the issues.
avatar
slash11: Must be the same awesome experts as the climate experts from the IPCC with their global warming scam or ?
And yes i can read the code of the climategate e-mails. It's complete charlatans work....
avatar
Lone3wolf: Non Sequiter. Your facts are uncoordinated.
Please try again.

What the hell has that to do with ANYTHING about 9/11? Still waiting for your proofs, too. Not forgot about those, so stop hand-waving, and address the issues.
Thing is he probably can't...he's that far gone into blind belief of whatever theories he's clawed onto.
Indeed.

Which is why I'm laughing so hard all through his statements-without-proof in this entire thread.
avatar
Lone3wolf: Non Sequiter. Your facts are uncoordinated.
Please try again.

What the hell has that to do with ANYTHING about 9/11? Still waiting for your proofs, too. Not forgot about those, so stop hand-waving, and address the issues.
avatar
GameRager: Thing is he probably can't...he's that far gone into blind belief of whatever theories he's clawed onto.
WTC 7, WTC 2, WTC 1 fell all in free fall speed. You can only explain this by a controlled demolition and that is certain for me no matter what "experts" try to convince me otherwise.
avatar
GameRager: Thing is he probably can't...he's that far gone into blind belief of whatever theories he's clawed onto.
avatar
slash11: WTC 7, WTC 2, WTC 1 fell all in free fall speed. You can only explain this by a controlled demolition and that is certain for me no matter what "experts" try to convince me otherwise.
WTC 1/2 were built in such a design that such a fall is possible from damage. Also lol u mad we're disproving you left and right?
avatar
GameRager: Thing is he probably can't...he's that far gone into blind belief of whatever theories he's clawed onto.
avatar
slash11: WTC 7, WTC 2, WTC 1 fell all in free fall speed. You can only explain this by a controlled demolition and that is certain for me no matter what "experts" try to convince me otherwise.
And that's why YOU fail. YOU don't understand the mechanics, the physics, OR the engineering behind the events that led upto the collpases.

Which is why I told you to go study some courses on it. For yourself. And not rely on web-tards and YouTube.

But you won't, because that would entail hard work, and many years, and you'd rather just be spoon-fed the shit so you don't have to think for yourself.

I repeat : Go away, little mind, and bother us no more with these absurd claims.

At least until you can provide a DECENT basis for your claims!


HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAA!
avatar
slash11: WTC 7, WTC 2, WTC 1 fell all in free fall speed. You can only explain this by a controlled demolition and that is certain for me no matter what "experts" try to convince me otherwise.
avatar
GameRager: WTC 1/2 were built in such a design that such a fall is possible from damage. Also lol u mad we're disproving you left and right?
Where is the disprove ? They were desigend that such a fall is possible if they take some damage, they fall into their footprint.....
avatar
Lone3wolf: Indeed.

Which is why I'm laughing so hard all through his statements-without-proof in this entire thread.
Whether you are right or wrong, (and I really can't be bothered to weigh in on one side or another of this boring old subject) You have neither managed to prove or disprove anything, or achieve anything except for a bunch of petty name-calling, as best I can tell.

It's the same reaction you'll see from any unthinking person whenever their core beliefs are challenged, but usually from the defenders of religion.

It's certainly not the best way to defend your (otherwise perfectly valid) viewpoint.
*pen at the ready*

*cough

I'm waiting.
avatar
GameRager: WTC 1/2 were built in such a design that such a fall is possible from damage. Also lol u mad we're disproving you left and right?
avatar
slash11: Where is the disprove ? They were desigend that such a fall is possible if they take some damage, they fall into their footprint.....
Again they were built with a crappy central support system surrounded by a thin frame of supports going outward. Of course they're gonna fall that way, especially if it's taken out somehow.....