It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
But since the ghost Osama Bin Laden is now dead the US government needs now a new enemy. How about Goofy and Mickey Mouse and they are hiding in China ^^.
avatar
slash11: But since the ghost Osama Bin Laden is now dead the US government needs now a new enemy. How about Goofy and Mickey Mouse and they are hiding in China ^^.
Where's Waldo?
avatar
slash11: But since the ghost Osama Bin Laden is now dead the US government needs now a new enemy. How about Goofy and Mickey Mouse and they are hiding in China ^^.
avatar
GameRager: Where's Waldo?
Behind you. With a knife.
avatar
GameRager: Where's Waldo?
avatar
Azarr: Behind you. With a knife.
FFFFFFFFFFu,,,gggrgle blechhh.........
avatar
Demut: Junge ...

avatar
Lone3wolf: Give your head a wobble, and get some reality.
avatar
Demut: NO U!

Seriously though, have you ever listened to a US president’s speech? Never heard the phrase “bringing peace to the Middle East” in there?
And have you never heard the expression "You catch more flies with honey than a stick"?
There's a VAST difference between negotiating a peace between 2 or more peoples, and exterminating 1 of those peoples off the face of the Earth.

But then....*some* people should know that. amirite? :rolleyes:
avatar
GameRager: Where's Waldo?
avatar
Azarr: Behind you. With a knife.
Is he in cahoots with Carmen Sandiego then?
avatar
Azarr: Behind you. With a knife.
avatar
Luisfius: Is he in cahoots with Carmen Sandiego then?
According to a show on Adult Swim, they even had a baby. They're currently organizing a manhunt for the most elusive toddler ever.
Post edited May 31, 2011 by GameRager
avatar
Lone3wolf: And have you never heard the expression "You catch more flies with honey than a stick"?
There's a VAST difference between negotiating a peace between 2 or more peoples, and exterminating 1 of those peoples off the face of the Earth.

But then....*some* people should know that. amirite? :rolleyes:
Again with the straw man arguments? Say, are you that much of a scumbag or are you just pretty shitty when it comes to text apprehension? Where exactly did BlazeKING (to whom you replied in this matter) say anything about exterminating anyone in his post?
avatar
Lone3wolf: There's a VAST difference between negotiating a peace between 2 or more peoples, and exterminating 1 of those peoples off the face of the Earth.

But then....*some* people should know that. amirite? :rolleyes:
avatar
Demut: Again with the straw man arguments? Say, are you that much of a scumbag or are you just pretty shitty when it comes to text apprehension? Where exactly did BlazeKING (to whom you replied in this matter) say anything about exterminating anyone in his post?
uhhh? what's wrong with your reading comprehension? It's pretty self-evident for ANYONE with more than 2 brain cells....which kind of rules out all you "Truthers" and "Conspiracy Theorists", wot? :rolleyes:

I'll spell it out in simple words for you reading impaired types.
No strawman, except from you with your logical fallacies here - HE said in http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/the_truth_about_9_11/post374
"The US is the strong arm of the New World Order, out to pacify the middle east"

which is fairly easy to understand - HE thinks that the justifications for invading Iraq, et al, were due to "America" launching the attacks on itself, so they could then send in troops to conquer the Middle East (and given all the shit from "Truthers"), presumably for the oil reserves therein.
The ONLY way (borne out by at least the last 1,500 years of history in that region - YOU do KNOW about the history of that region, don't you?) the Middle East would allow that, would be over their dead bodies. Hence the "Extermination" and "genocide" references I made.

You know, the biggest FUBAR the UK made in that region, was ignoring T E Lawrence, over the American "suggestions"...HE knew what he was talking about. I'm fairly sure the Americans still don't have a clue.
Rather like your, and Slash's attempts here. (I'm still not sure Blazeking was entirely serious, but what the hey, better to jump all over such a poor taste suggestion, than let it take hold in some retard's febrile imagination and then have them start to act on it)...
avatar
slash11: I can accept other opinions easily bu where is your proof that almunium slice through steel and even better. The nose out mistake FOX news. I think we all agree that a cockpit does not fly through a steel structure building and does not get out intact on the other side of the building.
avatar
AndrewC: It seems that you can't; I already told you that that plane didn't crash in a cube made entirely out of steel, so the density of the building was lower than that of the plane. Take into account the speed of the plane and the fact that it crashed into an area made mostly out of glass and you have your fucking proof.

Same thing for the cockpit. You need to accept that most of the walls inside that building were plaster and you can go through them with a fucking office chair and get on the other side without any serious damage if your speed is high enough.
I'd also like to add that I proved a while a few pages ago that the "Truther" video showing the "nose out" pictures used DELIBERATELY FALSIFIED IMAGES, HENCE THE DEBATE ABOUT THE FOX NEWS CLIP IS MEANINGLESS.
avatar
AndrewC: It seems that you can't; I already told you that that plane didn't crash in a cube made entirely out of steel, so the density of the building was lower than that of the plane. Take into account the speed of the plane and the fact that it crashed into an area made mostly out of glass and you have your fucking proof.

Same thing for the cockpit. You need to accept that most of the walls inside that building were plaster and you can go through them with a fucking office chair and get on the other side without any serious damage if your speed is high enough.
avatar
carmen510: I'd also like to add that I proved a while a few pages ago that the "Truther" video showing the "nose out" pictures used DELIBERATELY FALSIFIED IMAGES, HENCE THE DEBATE ABOUT THE FOX NEWS CLIP IS MEANINGLESS.
Where is your proof that these are deliberately falsified images ?
It was shown on 9/11 by fox news.......
Most of these so known "truthers" try to avoid that the mass media played a central role in the 9/11 hoax not as i do.
Post edited June 01, 2011 by slash11
Oh man! this just gets better and better!! ROFL!

You're *SERIOUSLY* citing RUPERT MURDOCH's FoxNews as a *RELIABLE* source???
"FoxNews! Now with added right-wing Christian white male propaganda!!"
"FoxNews! We only took a female anchor to avoid the lawsuits!!"
"FoxNews! If it wasn't about Christianity, it is NOW!!"

Fox News isn't news. It's a day-long opinion piece. And their opinions are really derisible.
(of and/or deserving derision, for you that won't understand the term).

Man! That's as good as "Hollywood thrillers aren't entertainment, they're a BLUEPRINT!!!!!111!!!1"

>.<
There isn't a big enough facepalm picture on the webs for that little gem

PMSL
BRB need to change underpants.
avatar
Lone3wolf: Oh man! this just gets better and better!! ROFL!

You're *SERIOUSLY* citing RUPERT MURDOCH's FoxNews as a *RELIABLE* source???
"FoxNews! Now with added right-wing Christian white male propaganda!!"
"FoxNews! We only took a female anchor to avoid the lawsuits!!"
"FoxNews! If it wasn't about Christianity, it is NOW!!"

Fox News isn't news. It's a day-long opinion piece. And their opinions are really derisible.
(of and/or deserving derision, for you that won't understand the term).

Man! That's as good as "Hollywood thrillers aren't entertainment, they're a BLUEPRINT!!!!!111!!!1"

>.<
There isn't a big enough facepalm picture on the webs for that little gem

PMSL
BRB need to change underpants.
It is not a matter of source, it is a matter what the mass media showed on 9/11. This is not an opinion it is just video footage.....

Since it is not easy to sell the story of 19 cave robbers destroying the whole wtc complex.
Of course short after the first "plane" hit a terrorist "expert" came to the rescue: Oh yes Bin Laden did it. How ? Let's start the ghost hunt !
Post edited June 01, 2011 by slash11
avatar
slash11: It is not a matter of source, it is a matter what the mass media showed on 9/11. This is not an opinion it is just video footage.....

Since it is not easy to sell the story of 19 cave robbers destroying the whole wtc complex.
But how YOU choose to interpret the video IS an opinion. Especially if the video is a KNOWN fake....
avatar
slash11: ...

Since it is not easy to sell the story of 19 cave robbers destroying the whole wtc complex.
You should really stop calling them cave robbers, it only shows how little you know and how stupid you really are.

Are you aware that most of the higher officers had engineering degrees from top US universities? Are you aware that a high number of members took flight lessons in US flight schools? Do you know about the serious training regime they endure before being actively involved?

It's stupid to call highly trained people "cave robbers" and it's even more idiotic to assume that just because most of the population can barely read the people involved in the attacks weren't groomed before it.