GameRager: 1. Money spent doesn't prove anything though, imo. And the whole blowjob money spending on commissions was by his rivals trying to get him out of office.
2. People have disproven it though, so yes I can be obnoxious about it. :P
3. See stuff like iron/etc...could've fallen on it and shielded it. Yes it is plausible.
1. Money spent doesn't
prove anything, but it's a pretty big hint, especially when you're talking about something as interesting to the public as "the biggest attack on U.S. soil since Pearl Harbour". The fact is that any investigation would have been nothing but a hindrance to the then-Government's plans for Iraq.
2. Nobody has proven or dis-proven
anything. On the one hand, we have the writings of the "Conspiracy Theorists", who are not objectively trustworthy when it comes to this sort of thing. On the other hand, we have the viewpoints of the U.S. Government, who are also not objectively trustworthy when it comes to this sort of thing.
One side are an assorted group of malcontents, paranoids, the ill-informed, and people with an axe to grind. The other side made billions of dollars from their side-investments and connections, and when asked to produce a report, produced a whitewash. Neither side can in anyway be described as "objective" when it comes to this subject.
3. Stuff like iron melted from the
fire. Those passports were right in the middle of the
fire. If you want to convince us that those passports were actually on that plane, and miraculously somehow survived when
nothing else did, you'd probably have more luck by first convincing us of the definite existence of God, fairies or travellers from the Future, then telling us it was His/their will.
In those unlikely circumstances, it might be plausible, I suppose...
