It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)The truth about 9/11(463 posts)(463 posts)
(463 posts)
Pages:
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
15
20
25
31
This is my favourite topic
Posted May 27, 2011
Has anyone actually seen the video the OP mentioned? I just watched parts of it -- it's disgusting antisemitic propaganda.
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
spindown: Has anyone actually seen the video the OP mentioned? I just watched parts of it -- it's disgusting antisemitic propaganda.
So it's about the lollercaust? Sounds like total trash then.
Posted May 27, 2011
I say his theory is crap because he is a conspiracy nut. He blindly believes anything on the internet. He could be right but never know. A conspiracy can be true but only nuts see nothing but conspiracy.
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
slash11: I have not studied physics, but you do not have to study physics to see the obvious.
But i can solve schrödinger equation or other differential equations that is no problem for me.
avatar
Tulivu: And if someone who has studied physics told you that you misunderstood, what would you do? That would conflict with your beliefs so you would likely just disregard the entire argument and move on to the next. I have not studied physics but I have a decent amount of experience in Sociology and you are classic.
Well i also talked with some physicist and other people who are not demolition experts but still know a lot about such constructions and all said the same. All 3 buildings are controlled demolition
Post edited May 27, 2011 by slash11
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
spindown: Has anyone actually seen the video the OP mentioned? I just watched parts of it -- it's disgusting antisemitic propaganda.
I'm at work and can't watch. Really? The Jews did it?
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
spindown: Has anyone actually seen the video the OP mentioned? I just watched parts of it -- it's disgusting antisemitic propaganda.
In your words no matter what they do it's always antisemitic propaganda ?
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
Tulivu: And if someone who has studied physics told you that you misunderstood, what would you do? That would conflict with your beliefs so you would likely just disregard the entire argument and move on to the next. I have not studied physics but I have a decent amount of experience in Sociology and you are classic.
avatar
slash11: Well i also talked with some physician and other people who are not demolition experts but still know a lot about such constructions and all said the same. All 3 buildings are controlled demolition
1. It's physicist. 2. If you don't know much about demolition then you're not qualified to judge if the building were demolished or not..
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
Tulivu: And if someone who has studied physics told you that you misunderstood, what would you do? That would conflict with your beliefs so you would likely just disregard the entire argument and move on to the next. I have not studied physics but I have a decent amount of experience in Sociology and you are classic.
avatar
slash11: Well i also talked with some physician and other people who are not demolition experts but still know a lot about such constructions and all said the same. All 3 buildings are controlled demolition
You talked to your doctor?

hmhmhmhhmhahahahaahhahaHAHAHAHAHA!
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
slash11: Well i also talked with some physician and other people who are not demolition experts but still know a lot about such constructions and all said the same. All 3 buildings are controlled demolition
avatar
GameRager: 1. It's physicist. 2. If you don't know much about demolition then you're not qualified to judge if the building were demolished or not..
Well how many demolition experts do you have here ? But still it is for me 100% certain that all 3 buildings are controlled demolition,
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
GameRager: 1. It's physicist. 2. If you don't know much about demolition then you're not qualified to judge if the building were demolished or not..
avatar
slash11: Well how many demolition experts do you have here ? But still it is for me 100% certain that all 3 buildings are controlled demolition,
Again that is your opinion, not fact. Unless you can prove it or link to evidence written by experts to prove it it will remain that way.

Like when I say Obama is awesome.....that's my opinion not a fact, and I never try to believe it's fact or pas it off as such.
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
GameRager: 1 Those figures prove nothing. It might've been given elss funds because ti didn't need as much, or politicians were trying to cut spending.
Might be. Also might be because of *insert any fantastic reason here*. I'd say that with all of the people involved, the international aspect of the event, and the vast amounts of physical evidence laying at Ground Zero, it still might require at least as much money to investigate as a blow-job? (That is, unless certain people really weren't interested, hello G.W.)

avatar
GameRager: 2. We never said the gov't wasn't involved in the events around 9/11, just that the op's theories are crap about the buildings falling because the gov't wanted people dead to further a pending war.
Well, we're agreed on that. We can't prove that though, so we shouldn't be too obnoxious about it.

I don't believe that anybody in the US Government would be psychotic enough to murder their own people to push a political agenda. The fact that I don't believe it doesn't make it impossible, though, and you can certainly see why some people might, with the vast, vast amounts of money that many powerful people in government made off the back of the whole thing.

avatar
GameRager: 3. Maybe something covered the passports and kept them from burning? It is plausible.
It's vaguely plausible, given... No, it's not really plausible is it. We all saw the huge fireball, and we all saw the Towers brought down, also by fire. There was a lot of fire. Paper doesn't really cope well in a firey environment. I'm pretty sure about that.
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
slash11: Well i also talked with some physician and other people who are not demolition experts but still know a lot about such constructions and all said the same. All 3 buildings are controlled demolition
Quote : NOT demolition experts.
Quote : Know a lot about such construction.

Give us your sources! What EXACTLY are their qualifications in this field. And Structural Engineering. And Mechanical Engineering. And Materials Testing. Ahh hell, I'll even throw in Physics and Maths, too.

It's been patently shown time and again that the "puffs of dust" at each floor as it collapsed was due to the compression of air preceding each floor down. NOT explosions.
Where's your PROOF, and not "some joe on the web said it is so! so it is SO!"? Actual, honesty to god, PROOFS!
Stop hand-waving, and side-stepping. Give us answers.
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
slash11: Well how many demolition experts do you have here ? But still it is for me 100% certain that all 3 buildings are controlled demolition,
avatar
GameRager: Again that is your opinion, not fact. Unless you can prove it or link to evidence written by experts to prove it it will remain that way.

Like when I say Obama is awesome.....that's my opinion not a fact, and I never try to believe it's fact or pas it off as such.
Ok then it is my opinion and still the official story is also only a theory not fact .
avatar
slash11: Well i also talked with some physician and other people who are not demolition experts but still know a lot about such constructions and all said the same. All 3 buildings are controlled demolition
avatar
Lone3wolf: Quote : NOT demolition experts.
Quote : Know a lot about such construction.

Give us your sources! What EXACTLY are their qualifications in this field. And Structural Engineering. And Mechanical Engineering. And Materials Testing. Ahh hell, I'll even throw in Physics and Maths, too.

It's been patently shown time and again that the "puffs of dust" at each floor as it collapsed was due to the compression of air preceding each floor down. NOT explosions.
Where's your PROOF, and not "some joe on the web said it is so! so it is SO!"? Actual, honesty to god, PROOFS!
Stop hand-waving, and side-stepping. Give us answers.
Give me your PROOF for your theory as well
Post edited May 27, 2011 by slash11
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
slash11: Well i also talked with some physicist and other people who are not demolition experts but still know a lot about such constructions and all said the same. All 3 buildings are controlled demolition
Emphasis mine. Talk to some people who are demolition experts and then come back to us.
Posted May 27, 2011
avatar
Buckid: Might be. Also might be because of *insert any fantastic reason here*. I'd say that with all of the people involved, the international aspect of the event, and the vast amounts of physical evidence laying at Ground Zero, it still might require at least as much money to investigate as a blow-job? (That is, unless certain people really weren't interested, hello G.W.)

=======================

Well, we're agreed on that. We can't prove that though, so we shouldn't be too obnoxious about it.

I don't believe that anybody in the US Government would be psychotic enough to murder their own people to push a political agenda. The fact that I don't believe it doesn't make it impossible, though, and you can certainly see why some people might, with the vast, vast amounts of money that many powerful people in government made off the back of the whole thing.

===================

It's vaguely plausible, given... No, it's not really plausible is it. We all saw the huge fireball, and we all saw the Towers brought down, also by fire. There was a lot of fire. Paper doesn't really cope well in a firey environment. I'm pretty sure about that.
1. Money spent doesn't prove anything though, imo. And the whole blowjob money spending on commissions was by his rivals trying to get him out of office.

2. People have disproven it though, so yes I can be obnoxious about it. :P

3. See stuff like iron/etc...could've fallen on it and shielded it. Yes it is plausible.
Pages:
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
15
20
25
31
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)The truth about 9/11(463 posts)(463 posts)
(463 posts)