It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
maycett: I might support the occupy movement if I knew what they actually want. At the moment, they just seem to be a bunch of people protesting everything, but with no constructive suggestions on what would make things better.
avatar
PandaLiang: Same here, I have completely no idea what they are asking for, and what changes they want to bring. Though I tend to stand by people on the weak side, I can't say I support them before actually knowing the answer for the questions above.
The methodology also leaves a lot to be desired.

Some of these actions, especially those that have been targeting the ports, seem to be directly hurting those who, one could suppose, would be among the people the movement purports to represent. Slowing operations to the point that workers are idled... it hurts the workers' pay but the corporation's products will get through eventually, one way or another. Meanwhile, police are taken from regular patrol duties, which may cause increased crime in some areas - again, hurting those the movement says it represents. Likewise, the cost of police service, and thus the cost to taxpayers, is increased through more overtime pay.

Why am I reminded of the lunacy of rioters tearing up their own neighborhoods?
avatar
tonyc_76: Having an iPhone or Blackberry, usually purchased back when they still had jobs, don't prove anything except that they bought one when they had jobs, a sensible decision then. Selling them afterward won't do much. Food and housing cost in America is so high that it will get them about two weeks worth of money and then it's gone. It makes much more sense to keep them so that they will have a phone that they can use to contact and be contacted by potential employers.
Sorry, but no. A smart phone is a status symbol, not a necessity. Replacing it with a cheap phone would provide identical core functionality while freeing up a nice pile of cash. My nephew has a phone that cost a mere NZ$20 (roughly US$15). It doesn't have "apps" and other trendy things but it has all the core phone functionality plus some extra goodies like taking photos and accessing Facebook.

We're not expecting them to sell their wedding rings or other items of personal value to make ends meet--it's just a phone. Holding onto meaningless possessions which would be far more useful in cash form--and will be obsolete in a few years anyway--really says something about a person's priorities.
avatar
tonyc_76: Hi, Aver.

The average Occupy supporter probably has more money than the average person on earth.

This does not detract from their plight. Jobless is jobless. Not being able to afford food, housing, education, and health care are bad, regardless of where the person is. Having an iPhone or Blackberry, usually purchased back when they still had jobs, don't prove anything except that they bought one when they had jobs, a sensible decision then. Selling them afterward won't do much. Food and housing cost in America is so high that it will get them about two weeks worth of money and then it's gone. It makes much more sense to keep them so that they will have a phone that they can use to contact and be contacted by potential employers.
avatar
Aver: Oh come on. You have lower unemployment rate than most of Europe. I know that being jobless is terrible thing but when I was one I was looking for a job and I was trying to learn stuff, instead of protesting.

First I found work as damn cashier in supermarket. I accepted it even tho my ambitions was way higher. Now, I found nice job in bank and I'm pretty damn sure I would not have it if I would spent time on street instead of trying to change something myself. And I live in country that has a way higher unemployment rate than US.
You may not realize how shit works here, which is fair, this place is quite different from most places in Europe. Would that cashier job have worked out for you if you'd had to walk or ride the bus 2-4 hours each way? What if you had a kid and were responsible for getting them to and from school? Oh, bus passes are pretty damned expensive here (around 6 USD per day, which will equate to 1 hour of your shift), forgot to say. Maybe you could have afforded a car to get to work? In fact, some employers won't hire you if you don't have one.

You don't get benefits for low paying jobs, typically. Hope you don't get sick, because all you can afford is some aspirin or tylenol. Oh, we also have a lot of states that allow an employer to let you go for any reason whatsoever (for example, if you miss a shift due to being very ill), as long as they don't admit it was for bigoted reasons you'll probably lose your cashier job.

Long commutes are common here, everything is very spread out. There's a big lack of social services other places take for granted. Family typically is not close and you cannot rely on relatives for childcare. Daycare runs around 400USD per month per child in my area. At minimum wage that would be 1/3 of your paycheck or so, before you'd bought food or paid rent.

I don't know how they count your jobless rates over there but ours excludes anyone who can't actively look for work or has given up, even temporarily. It also doesn't count people who've run out of unemployment benefits. So the number of adults without jobs is much higher than our jobless rate would imply, even if you remove retired people.
avatar
tonyc_76: Having an iPhone or Blackberry, usually purchased back when they still had jobs, don't prove anything except that they bought one when they had jobs, a sensible decision then. Selling them afterward won't do much. Food and housing cost in America is so high that it will get them about two weeks worth of money and then it's gone. It makes much more sense to keep them so that they will have a phone that they can use to contact and be contacted by potential employers.
avatar
Arkose: Sorry, but no. A smart phone is a status symbol, not a necessity. Replacing it with a cheap phone would provide identical core functionality while freeing up a nice pile of cash. My nephew has a phone that cost a mere NZ$20 (roughly US$15). It doesn't have "apps" and other trendy things but it has all the core phone functionality plus some extra goodies like taking photos and accessing Facebook.

We're not expecting them to sell their wedding rings or other items of personal value to make ends meet--it's just a phone. Holding onto meaningless possessions which would be far more useful in cash form--and will be obsolete in a few years anyway--really says something about a person's priorities.
That's simply not true, poor people often use them to tether (it only takes them one family member or friend who knows how to unlock the phone to do this) and use it for their home internet as well. It's a net savings for them. They're also useful beyond what a dumb phone does, especially if you're job hunting. They're also pretty worthless used and you're locked into a contract paying for them for 2 years whether you want them or not.
Post edited January 17, 2012 by orcishgamer
avatar
PandaLiang: Same here, I have completely no idea what they are asking for, and what changes they want to bring. Though I tend to stand by people on the weak side, I can't say I support them before actually knowing the answer for the questions above.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: The methodology also leaves a lot to be desired.

Some of these actions, especially those that have been targeting the ports, seem to be directly hurting those who, one could suppose, would be among the people the movement purports to represent. Slowing operations to the point that workers are idled... it hurts the workers' pay but the corporation's products will get through eventually, one way or another. Meanwhile, police are taken from regular patrol duties, which may cause increased crime in some areas - again, hurting those the movement says it represents. Likewise, the cost of police service, and thus the cost to taxpayers, is increased through more overtime pay.

Why am I reminded of the lunacy of rioters tearing up their own neighborhoods?
The ordinary citizens will always be the first getting impact by all sort of public protest, so I'll actually say I'm fine with that as long as they have a just and reasonable point and be non-violent. From what I heard from the news, I have not seen that point yet though.
avatar
Aver: Oh come on. You have lower unemployment rate than most of Europe. I know that being jobless is terrible thing but when I was one I was looking for a job and I was trying to learn stuff, instead of protesting.

First I found work as damn cashier in supermarket. I accepted it even tho my ambitions was way higher. Now, I found nice job in bank and I'm pretty damn sure I would not have it if I would spent time on street instead of trying to change something myself. And I live in country that has a way higher unemployment rate than US.
Gah. The official unemployment rate... does not reflect the situation.

And they are looking for jobs.
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/mcdonalds-hires-62000-turns-away-over-938000-applicants-minimum-wage-part-time-jobs

A McDonald _part_time_ (not even full time) job pays the minimum allowable wage, has no real possibility for promotion, has no job security, etc. It might not be the worst job out there, but it's pretty close. A million people applied. A measly 62 thousand got accepted.
avatar
PandaLiang: Same here, I have completely no idea what they are asking for, and what changes they want to bring. Though I tend to stand by people on the weak side, I can't say I support them before actually knowing the answer for the questions above.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: The methodology also leaves a lot to be desired.

Some of these actions, especially those that have been targeting the ports, seem to be directly hurting those who, one could suppose, would be among the people the movement purports to represent. Slowing operations to the point that workers are idled... it hurts the workers' pay but the corporation's products will get through eventually, one way or another. Meanwhile, police are taken from regular patrol duties, which may cause increased crime in some areas - again, hurting those the movement says it represents. Likewise, the cost of police service, and thus the cost to taxpayers, is increased through more overtime pay.

Why am I reminded of the lunacy of rioters tearing up their own neighborhoods?
You shouldn't be, a lot of port truckers wrote articles in support of the pickets and stating how bad it was and additionally how many of them were terrified to speak up. I'd encourage you to read about port trucking, it's been deregulated and industry is pretty much fucking these people and blacklisting anyone who says a word about it.
avatar
Arkose: Sorry, but no. A smart phone is a status symbol, not a necessity. Replacing it with a cheap phone would provide identical core functionality while freeing up a nice pile of cash. My nephew has a phone that cost a mere NZ$20 (roughly US$15). It doesn't have "apps" and other trendy things but it has all the core phone functionality plus some extra goodies like taking photos and accessing Facebook.

We're not expecting them to sell their wedding rings or other items of personal value to make ends meet--it's just a phone. Holding onto meaningless possessions which would be far more useful in cash form--and will be obsolete in a few years anyway--really says something about a person's priorities.
Hi, Arkose. Orcishgamer already made some salient points.

Let me add too that many of those "from iPad, iPhone, Blackberry" stuff will come from the reporters and organization leaders, who require those because of their roles. Also, a significant amount of Occupiers are students, who can count still on their parents support (please don't dismiss student movements because of this. In many countries student protests have sparked significant change).

Unfortunately there's no data on how many Occupiers have already sold their iPads, iPhones, Blackberries, Samsungs, etc. I'm sure there's many. Craigslist is full of people trying to sell those and some of them must've been individuals instead of stores.
Post edited January 17, 2012 by tonyc_76
avatar
Nroug7: Do you support or not support this?
I support this 100%, however i don't see anything significant happening anytime soon. As witnessed here in Los Angeles, when the local city government becomes tired of the protesters they just call out the L.A.P.D. aka gestapo. I do applogise to anyone in law enforcement as they are only doing what they are told to do.
avatar
orcishgamer: That's simply not true, poor people often use them to tether (it only takes them one family member or friend who knows how to unlock the phone to do this) and use it for their home internet as well. It's a net savings for them. They're also useful beyond what a dumb phone does, especially if you're job hunting. They're also pretty worthless used and you're locked into a contract paying for them for 2 years whether you want them or not.
Ah, I see. I wasn't aware that iPhones were of lesser value in the US; here they have a decent resale value and once unlocked can work with most carriers. I also had not considered tethering as an option (which is quite uncommon here and tends to be less affordable than alternatives).

avatar
oldschool: I support this 100%, however i don't see anything significant happening anytime soon. As witnessed here in Los Angeles, when the local city government becomes tired of the protesters they just call out the L.A.P.D. aka gestapo. I do applogise to anyone in law enforcement as they are only doing what they are told to do.
The Occupy movements are opposed by the city council or the like because what they are doing is against the law. These people are not holding straight-up protests but rather long-term sit-ins. Protesting is lawful in and of itself but indefinitely occupying public/private property without permission usually isn't, and the illegal act trumps the legal one.

Non-protesting occupiers (squatters etc.) receive the same treatment from authorities but typically don't get as much media attention because hearing about a bunch of people being moved on is much more interesting when the people being evicted say they were there to fight the good fight or whatever rather than just because they wanted to. Boring stories don't make the news.
I think you may be lost.
I support every movement against govts. that waste people's money and rises taxes all the time.

I don't support douchebags who envy rich people and who say "minimum wage should be at least $10-15 an hour". These people should die without leaving any descendants.
Post edited January 17, 2012 by keeveek
If I didn't agree with the occupy protesters on anything (which is not the case), I would still be on their side due to the various images of policemen beating and pepper-spraying protesters who have already submitted to them peacefully. The people who did those things are more than criminals, they use their state-sanctioned powers to terrorize people.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: The methodology also leaves a lot to be desired.

Some of these actions, especially those that have been targeting the ports, seem to be directly hurting those who, one could suppose, would be among the people the movement purports to represent. Slowing operations to the point that workers are idled... it hurts the workers' pay but the corporation's products will get through eventually, one way or another. Meanwhile, police are taken from regular patrol duties, which may cause increased crime in some areas - again, hurting those the movement says it represents. Likewise, the cost of police service, and thus the cost to taxpayers, is increased through more overtime pay.

Why am I reminded of the lunacy of rioters tearing up their own neighborhoods?
avatar
orcishgamer: You shouldn't be, a lot of port truckers wrote articles in support of the pickets and stating how bad it was and additionally how many of them were terrified to speak up. I'd encourage you to read about port trucking, it's been deregulated and industry is pretty much fucking these people and blacklisting anyone who says a word about it.
Happy like these workers?: http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/12/occupy-oakland-longview-west-coast-port-shut-down

The unions aren't feeling so thrilled about it, either: http://articles.sfgate.com/2011-12-11/news/30504003_1_port-shutdown-union-workers-west-coast-ports

A union administrator says something I can agree with:
He added: "The port is a public entity. It's really not the 1 percent. Go shut down a country club - that's the 1 percent."
avatar
HereForTheBeer: ....
http://occupywallst.org/article/open-letter-americas-port-truck-drivers-occupy-por/ That's a repost from a newspaper somewhere (I forget where I originally found it).

There's a lot of other letters of support and complaints from port truckers that go into great detail about exactly what regulation did to them. Does it affect these guys that can barely make ends meet? Yep, and that's what the assholes who are really the source of the issues are counting on. Some know that they're taking a small punch as a strategy to swing a haymaker back at that the real source of the problem. Some don't like that strategy. I can see both sides, but characterizing it as OWS unilaterally fucking over these poor working stiffs is not really fair when many of said working stiffs see it as a step in the right direction.

Incidentally, none of those unions represent the port truckers (they largely don't have unions anymore). They represent people like Longshoremen which have phenomenal benefits and a very low workload. They have some of the best union contracts in the nation. It's a bit hypocritical to bitch out the guys making 7 bucks and hour when your unionized workers get 40 bucks plus great benefits and a 35 hour work week.
Post edited January 17, 2012 by orcishgamer
avatar
orcishgamer: I predict this thread will end rationally with calm, focused debate and respect on all sides.
avatar
da187jimmbones: Radar predicts incoming posts with personal attacks, semantics, tangents, and no substance. All valid points please report to the bunker until the battle is over.
Your radar is wrong, you bastard. Oh, and screw your bunker, I'll send a few banelings to take care of that issue.

Anyways, so far I 'like' where are government is heading. We may still be in shit, but at least we're not in deep shit.