Theoclymenus: @JMich
(Hint : if you're going to block someone then out of politeness please tell them in advance so that they don't waste half an hour writing out a response which will not process. I would do the same for you and in fact would never have blocked you in the first place, regardless of whether I agreed with you or not.)
JMich: I haven't blocked anyone on GOG, and I don't find reason to do so at all. In case a PM doesn't go through, please use the "Reply" function, I still get a notification. It is possible that you had hit the PM character limit, but not knowing your message I can't know for sure.
For the hardware and software analogy on the books, if you do wish to use that, then the book are the software and a working vision is the hardware. If by getting older your vision deteriorates, then you won't be able to read your books, unless you do something about your vision, be it glasses or surgery.
On the selling of games, you mean the industry selling to consumers, in which case I'll again ask you to check the TD2 image, or of consumers re-selling their games? Consumers can resell any physical media only game, no matter its DRM (assuming it's an offline disk check or a serial), but if the DRM is account based, only way to be able to do that would be through the company. As before, XBox One would allow that, and there are rumours that Steam will evenyually allow it as well.
As for you howling with laughter on the "Depending how the account is validated", do think a bit. If the only check is a login, your account could be resold by you, though no idea of the legality. Could you say that you are using your right to resell, or would you be bound by the ToS which forbid you from reselling? If the account also requires more information, including Name, Age and Address (Blizzard for example), then reselling it would be harder.
On the other hand, GamersGate (which is an account based store) does allow reselling. So it is possible to do it, much to your enjoyment.
P.S. Try sending a one line PM to me again, just to see if you are truly blocked or not.
I didn't try to PM you, I merely tried to reply to a post of yours on here and it didn't seem to have appeaed, though when I looked later it had appeared. But by this time I had already written out a second post which was almost exactly the same as the first in terms of its content. Anyway, it doesn't matter.
I still think you are quibbling though. I own (yes, OWN) a paperback copy of The Silmarillion and between now and my death I can do what I want with it : keep it, sell it, give it away, make a cake out of it. Why should games be any different ? A good number of my games (disc versions) are now useless but that's not due to DRM, it's usually because they won't work on modern operating systems.
Even ithough I can resell a game on Gamersgate that still means that I depend on the continued existence of Gamersgate and that it is Gamersgate which owns my game after I have bought it, not me. This is really just an extension of DRM. I do not have to resell The Silmarillion through the shop I bought it from.
I was talking about (for one thing) publishers deliberately releasing a game in a staggered fashion, in instalments, to try to extract the maximum amount of money possible out of the customer. This is really irritating and in my view it's tantamount to daylight robbery.
ON topic, I just bought System Shock 2 for the second time. I have never bought any game more than twice. I don't blame gamers for choosing to buy a game multiple times but hardly anyone used to do this so why is it the craze all of a sudden ?